Accountants can be involved in money laundering schemes in various ways, either knowingly or unknowingly. Some of the common methods that accountants can use to launder money are:
* Overstating income to hide excess cash: This method involves inflating the revenues or profits of a business to conceal the origin of illicit funds. For example, an accountant can create fake invoices or receipts to justify the deposit of cash from illegal sources into the business account. This can make the cash appear as legitimate income from the business operations.
* Acting as a conduit for transferring cash between accounts: This method involves using the accountant' s own account or a third-party account to move funds around and obscure the audit trail. For example, an accountant can receive cash from a client and deposit it into their own account, then transfer it to another account or withdraw it in a different location. This can make it difficult to trace the source and destination of the funds.
* Acting as a designee for someone who wishes to hide their identity: This method involves using the accountant's name or credentials to open accounts or conduct transactions on behalf of a client who wants to remain anonymous. For example, an accountant can act as a nominee director or shareholder for a shell company that is used to launder money. This can make it appear as if the accountant is the owner or beneficiary of the funds, while the actual owner or beneficiary is hidden.
Money Laundering: What It Is and How to Prevent It - Investopedia, The Process of Laundering Money Revealed: accountants aiding money laundering - Accountancy Age, Accountants' methods Accountants in the anti-money laundering front line, Accountants' obligations
https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/119840NCJRS.pdf

MLROs are responsible for implementing and enforcing an appropriate risk-based approach for their firm, ensuring compliance with the relevant laws and regulations, and reporting any suspicious activities to the authorities. If they fail to discharge their duties, they may face personal liability and civil or criminal sanctions. MLROs are not the only individuals that can be held responsible for AML program deficiencies, as other seniormanagers, directors, or partners may also be liable depending on their role and involvement.
However, MLROs are often the primary focus of enforcement actions due to their specific responsibilities and obligations. MLROs cannot avoid liability by agreeing to a civil penalty, as this does not absolve them from their legal duties or potential criminal prosecution. Banks can also be found liable for AML program deficiencies and face fines, penalties, or other sanctions.
Technical factsheet The role of the money laundering reporting officer
Consequences of not complying | AUSTRAC
Money Laundering Reporting Officer: The Role Of MLRO
FinCEN Penalizes U.S. Bank Official for Corporate Anti-Money Laundering Failures

Reference: https://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/recommendations/pdfs/FATF%
20Recommendations%202012.pdf

Identity theft is a form of fraud or cheating of identity in which someone wrongfully obtains and uses another person's personal data in some way that involves fraud or deception, typically for economic gain. By compromising an individual's personal data, such as their Social Security Number, bank account numbers, or other personal information, a cybercriminal can use it to gain access to credit cards or other financial accounts, or to open new accounts in the victim's name.

The customer's profile and transactions are highly suspicious and indicative of possible money laundering.
The customer's income, source of wealth, and investment plans do not match with the large and frequent transfers from a diamond distributor, which is a high-risk business sector for money laundering. The customer' s transfers to Hong Kong, which is a high-risk jurisdiction for money laundering, also raise red flags. The anti- money laundering specialist should recommend contacting the competent authority and local law enforcement to report the suspicious activity and cooperate with any investigation. This is in accordance with the FATF Recommendation 20, which states that "If a financial institution suspects or has reasonable grounds to suspect that funds arethe proceeds of a criminal activity, or are related to terrorist financing, it should be required, by law, to report promptly its suspicions to the financial intelligence unit (FIU)"1. The other options are not appropriate, as they do not address the urgency and severity of the situation.
1: FATF (2012), International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism & Proliferation, FATF, Paris, France, www.fatf-gafi.org/recommendations.html, p. 19.