According to API RP 571, under Oxidation:
"Austenitic stainless steels (300 Series) are generally used for oxidation resistance up to about 1500°F (815° C). At higher temperatures, scaling and loss of protective chromium oxide layers increase."
"Above these temperatures, specialized high-temperature alloys may be required." (Reference: API RP 571, Section 5.1.1 - Oxidation) Therefore, option C is the correct answer.

According to API RP 571, high-cycle fatigue (HCF) is characterized by very tight, narrow cracks that can escape detection using typical NDE methods due to their minimal opening displacement and fine geometry.
* From API RP 571 Section 5.2.1 (Fatigue - High Cycle):
"The cracks are usually tight and may be difficult to detect using conventional NDE techniques such as PT or MT. UT and RT may also have difficulty identifying these small, tight flaws, especially in early stages of propagation." The primary issue in NDE is not the geometry (such as 90° corners) or ID location, but rather the tightness and early-stage subtlety of the cracks which results in reduced detectability. Therefore, option B is correct as it aligns most accurately with API RP 571's detailed characterization of HCF detection challenges.