Conducting periodic audits by third-party specialists is a reliable way to monitor compliance with ethical standards, as these audits provide an objective assessment. This aligns with ethical sourcing practices, as it promotes accountability and ensures continuous adherence to agreed-upon standards.

Eamon should use a cross-functional team (this rules out two of the options). The purpose of using a cross-functional team is to use the knowledge of people from other departments as they may better understand the service required and help assess any technical questions. Therefore a cross-functional team of procurement personnel, isn't cross-functional (they're all the same function). Yoyos is a bit of a silly example, the exam questions are a little more serious- but the learning outcome is the same; use a cross-functional team to evaluate bids.

You should investigate automatically low tenders by clarifying the bid with the supplier. It could be they have misunderstood the requirement. Or the bid could be genuine and they can really provide best value for money.
But without enquiring, you just don't know.

The correct answer is 'yes - these can be completed without warning which would give Ali an accurate picture of the supplier's operations'. The other options are incorrect:
1) you can do many types of audit- financial, ethical, Health and Safety etc
2) asking a supplier about their ethical practices isn't likely going to get you accurate information. They'll just tell you what they think you want to hear
3) audits are great- but they don't ALWAYS uncover issues. Always is the key word in that sentence which makes it incorrect.

Primary data includes trade fairs and exhibits, and phone calls to current suppliers. The others are examples of secondary data.
Remember primary= you do it yourself, Secondary = someone else did it.