A current ratio below 1 suggests that the supplier may not have sufficient current assets to cover short-term liabilities, which could pose a risk to the buyer. Assessing financial stability aligns with responsible sourcing practices, as it ensures suppliers can fulfill contracts without disruption.

Defining corrective actions and running supplier development programs are effective remedial actions following an audit. These approaches support continuous improvement, aligning with responsible sourcing by helping suppliers meet ethical and performance standards.

Profitability and asset levels indicate a supplier's financial stability and ability to meet contract demands.
Responsible sourcing practices include assessing financial capacity to reduce risk in the supply chain and ensure long-term supplier viability.

One of the biggest advantages to making an item over buying it is 'improved quality control'.
When you make the product yourself, you can set the quality parameters you require and aren't re-stricted to, or dependant on, what the supplier does. The other options are incorrect- making stuff inhouse would mean you hold more inventory. If the supplier has a higher skillset than you, you would outsource. Threat of substitutions wouldn't impact this decision.
For a list of pros and cons relating to the 'make or buy' decision see p.5. This is a hot topic for the exam.

96 is the correct answer- weighted point systems should add up to 100 (as in 100%)