Legislative changes wouldn't affect rivalry in a market as all suppliers would be equally as affected, the same with supply chain disruptions. Factors which do affect rivalry include; industry growth and decline, product differences, brand identity, switching costs, diversity of competitors and exit barriers. These are listed on p.41

The correct answer is 'Yes- partnership sourcing can improve performance which will ultimately satisfy the end customer'. The important thing to note in this Question: is the word 'monopolistic'. This means that there are no alternative suppliers- so the 'no' options are wrong- there are no alternative suppliers and no opportunity to outsource. The other answer is incorrect as sales figures isn't Andrew's concern - it's the complaints and quality of the product. Improving performance to satisfy end customers is therefore his main driver for considering a Partnership. See p. 127 for more information on Drivers of Partnership Sourcing. This comes up a lot in the exam

Arranging a meeting to clarify roles and setting performance targets provides clear expectations and encourages accountability. This aligns with CIPS guidelines on managing conflicts through constructive engagement.

For partnership sourcing to succeed, senior management buy-in is essential. Selling the idea internally ensures commitment of resources, trust, and long-term strategy alignment. Options A and D undermine partnerships, while B contradicts the open and collaborative nature of partnership sourcing.

Forward buying involves purchasing in advance to lock in current prices and avoid future increases. This strategy is effective in volatile markets where price hikes are anticipated.