The correct answer is Watering-hole because the attack involves compromising a legitimate website that is regularly visited by a specific group of targeted users-in this case, journalists-in order to indirectly infect or compromise them. The Security+ SY0-701 study guide defines watering-hole attacks as targeted attacks where adversaries identify websites frequented by their intended victims and then compromise those sites to deliver malware, steal credentials, or conduct further exploitation.
In this scenario, the attacker does not directly target the journalists' email systems. Instead, the attacker compromises a trusted website that the journalists frequently access. When the journalists visit the site, malicious code can be delivered through drive-by downloads, malicious scripts, or credential-harvesting mechanisms. This technique is particularly effective for nation-state attackers because it leverages trust and normal user behavior, making detection more difficult.
Option A, On-path, is incorrect because on-path (man-in-the-middle) attacks involve intercepting or altering communications between two parties in transit, rather than compromising a third-party website. Option C, Typosquatting, involves registering domains with misspelled names to trick users into visiting malicious sites, which is not described here. Option D, Brand impersonation, typically refers to phishing or spoofing attacks that mimic a trusted brand to deceive users, often via email or fake websites, rather than compromising a legitimate one.
The SY0-701 objectives emphasize that watering-hole attacks are commonly associated with advanced persistent threats (APTs), including nation-state actors, because they allow precise targeting of specific industries, professions, or organizations. This attack method highlights the importance of browser security, threat intelligence, web filtering, and user awareness to reduce exposure to trusted-but-compromised resources.
In summary, compromising a frequently used website to gain access to a targeted group's accounts is a textbook example of a watering-hole attack.

Improving security awareness training directly addresses user behavior by teaching employees how to better recognize legitimate emails versus actual phishing attempts. Enhanced training can reduce the number of false positives by helping users more accurately identify true phishing attempts, lowering unnecessary reports and thus help desk workload.
Reference:
CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Official Study Guide, Domain 5.5: "Improved security awareness training helps reduce false positives in user reporting by teaching users to accurately identify phishing attempts." Exam Objectives 5.5: "Summarize security awareness and training techniques."

Because the organization plans to deploy high-powered wireless access points, the next critical step is to create a heat map of the building perimeter. CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 highlights wireless heat maps as an essential design tool for identifying signal bleed, coverage overlap, dead zones, and areas where wireless signals extend beyond intended boundaries.
Stronger access points increase the risk of signal leakage outside the building, which could allow unauthorized users to attempt connections from parking lots or nearby buildings. A heat map enables the security team to visualize RF propagation and adjust power levels, antenna placement, and access point locations to minimize external exposure while maintaining internal coverage.
Deploying IPSec tunnels (B) is unnecessary for standard WLAN architectures. Enabling WPA2-PSK (C) weakens security compared to WPA3. Disabling SSH administration (D) is a hardening step but does not address wireless coverage risks.
Therefore, the correct next step in secure Wi-Fi design is A: Create a heat map of the building perimeter.

Aconflict of interest (B)arises when personal relationships or interests could potentially influence professional decisions. In this case, the CFO's friendship with the vendor could improperly affect the procurement decision-making process.
This scenario falls underDomain 5.3: Explain the importance of frameworks, policies, procedures, and controls-specifically under"Personnel policies (e.g., conflict of interest, mandatory vacations, job rotation)."

Threat hunting is the process of proactively searching for signs of malicious activity or compromise in a network, rather than waiting for alerts or indicators of compromise (IOCs) to appear. Threat hunting can help identify new tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) used by malicious actors, as well as uncover hidden or stealthy threats that may have evaded detection by security tools. Threat hunting requires a combination of skills, tools, and methodologies, such as hypothesis generation, data collection and analysis, threat intelligence, and incident response. Threat hunting can also help improve the security posture of an organization by providing feedback and recommendations for security improvements. Reference = CompTIA Security+ Certification Exam Objectives, Domain 4.1: Given a scenario, analyze potential indicators of malicious activity. CompTIA Security+ Study Guide (SY0-701), Chapter 4: Threat Detection and Response, page 153. Threat Hunting - SY0-701 CompTIA Security+ : 4.1, Video 3:18. CompTIA Security+ Certification Exam SY0-701 Practice Test 1, Question 3.