During a computer hacking forensic investigation, an investigator is tasked with acquiring volatile data from a live Linux system with limited physical access. Which methodology would be the most suitable for this scenario?

Jacob, a cybercrime investigator, joined a forensics team to participate in a criminal case involving digital evidence. After the investigator collected all the evidence and presents it to the court, the judge dropped the case and the defense attorney pressed charges against Jacob and the rest of the forensics team for unlawful search and seizure.
What forensics privacy issue was not addressed prior to collecting the evidence?

As a Computer Hacking Forensics Investigator, you are tasked with tracing a series of illegal transactions believed to originate from the dark web. You know the transactions were made using Tor, a browser providing anonymity. However, in an authoritarian country where the usage of the Tor network is restricted, the suspect is believed to be using an undisclosed Tor network feature to bypass these restrictions. What feature is likely being used in this scenario?

Study the log given below and answer the following question:
Apr 24 14:46:46 [4663]: spp_portscan: portscan detected from
194.222.156.169
Apr 24 14:46:46 [4663]: IDS27/FIN Scan: 194.222.156.169:56693 ->
172.16.1.107:482
Apr 24 18:01:05 [4663]: IDS/DNS-version-query: 212.244.97.121:3485 ->
172.16.1.107:53
Apr 24 19:04:01 [4663]: IDS213/ftp-passwd-retrieval:
194.222.156.169:1425 -> 172.16.1.107:21
Apr 25 08:02:41 [5875]: spp_portscan: PORTSCAN DETECTED from
24.9.255.53
Apr 25 02:08:07 [5875]: IDS277/DNS-version-query: 63.226.81.13:4499 ->
172.16.1.107:53
Apr 25 02:08:07 [5875]: IDS277/DNS-version-query: 63.226.81.13:4630 ->
172.16.1.101:53
Apr 25 02:38:17 [5875]: IDS/RPC-rpcinfo-query: 212.251.1.94:642 ->
172.16.1.107:111
Apr 25 19:37:32 [5875]: IDS230/web-cgi-space-wildcard:
198.173.35.164:4221 -> 172.16.1.107:80
Apr 26 05:45:12 [6283]: IDS212/dns-zone-transfer: 38.31.107.87:2291 ->
172.16.1.101:53
Apr 26 06:43:05 [6283]: IDS181/nops-x86: 63.226.81.13:1351 ->
172.16.1.107:53
Apr 26 06:44:25 victim7 PAM_pwdb[12509]: (login) session opened for
user simple by (uid=0)
Apr 26 06:44:36 victim7 PAM_pwdb[12521]: (su) session opened for user
simon by simple(uid=506)
Apr 26 06:45:34 [6283]: IDS175/socks-probe: 24.112.167.35:20 ->
172.16.1.107:1080
Apr 26 06:52:10 [6283]: IDS127/telnet-login-incorrect: 172.16.1.107:23
-> 213.28.22.189:4558
Precautionary measures to prevent this attack would include writing firewall rules. Of these firewall rules, which among the following would be appropriate?

An experienced forensic investigator, Chris, is tasked with preparing a testbed for malware analysis. Given the complexity of the malware samples, which are mostly compatible with Windows binary executables, Chris must take meticulous precautions to ensure the integrity of the lab environment. Which of the following procedures would Chris NOT be likely to follow in preparing the testbed for malware analysis?