301b Exam Question 111
An LTM device has a virtual server configured as a Performance Layer 4 virtual listening on 0.0.0.0:0 to perform routing of packets to an upstream router. The client machine at IP address 192.168.0.4 is attempting to contact a host upstream of the LTM device on IP address 10.0.0.99.
The network flow is asymmetrical, and the following TCP capture displays:
# tcpdump -nnni 0.0 'host 192.168.0.4 and host 10.0.0.99'
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on 0.0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
05:07:55.499954 IP 192.168.0.4.35345 > 10.0.0.99.443: S 3205656213:3205656213(0) ack
3267995082 win 1480
05:07:55.499983 IP 10.0.0.99.443 > 192.168.0.4.35345: R 1:1(0) ack 1 win 0
05:07:56.499960 IP 192.168.0.4.35345 > 10.0.0.99.443: S 3205656213:3205656213(0) ack
3267995082 win 1480
05:07:56.499990 IP 10.0.0.99.443 > 192.168.0.4.35345: R 1:1(0) ack 1 win 0
4 packets captured
Which option within the fastL4 profile needs to be enabled by the LTM Specialist to prevent the LTM device from rejecting the flow?
The network flow is asymmetrical, and the following TCP capture displays:
# tcpdump -nnni 0.0 'host 192.168.0.4 and host 10.0.0.99'
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on 0.0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
05:07:55.499954 IP 192.168.0.4.35345 > 10.0.0.99.443: S 3205656213:3205656213(0) ack
3267995082 win 1480
05:07:55.499983 IP 10.0.0.99.443 > 192.168.0.4.35345: R 1:1(0) ack 1 win 0
05:07:56.499960 IP 192.168.0.4.35345 > 10.0.0.99.443: S 3205656213:3205656213(0) ack
3267995082 win 1480
05:07:56.499990 IP 10.0.0.99.443 > 192.168.0.4.35345: R 1:1(0) ack 1 win 0
4 packets captured
Which option within the fastL4 profile needs to be enabled by the LTM Specialist to prevent the LTM device from rejecting the flow?
301b Exam Question 112
Given LTM device ltm log:
Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 notice promptstatusd[3695]: 01460006:5: semaphore mcpd.running(1) held
Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 notice promptstatusd[3695]: 01460006:5:
Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 warning promptstatusd[3695]: 01460005:4: mcpd.running(1) held, wait for mcpd
Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 info sod[3925]: 010c0009:6: Lost connection to mcpd reestablishing.
Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 err bcm56xxd[3847]: 012c0004:3: Lost connection with MCP: 16908291 ... Exiting bsx_connect.cpp(174)
Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 info bcm56xxd[3847]: 012c0012:6: MCP Exit Status Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 info bcm56xxd[3847]: 012c0012:6: Info: LACP stats (time now:1348717868) : no traffic
Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 info bcm56xxd[3847]: 012c0014:6: Exiting...
Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 err lind[3842]: 013c0004:3: IO error on recv from mcpd connection lost Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 notice bigd[3837]: 01060110:5: Lost connection to mcpd with
error 16908291, will reinit connection.
Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 err statsd[3857]: 011b0004:3: Initial subscription for system configuration failed with error '' Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 err statsd[3857]: 011b0001:3: Connection to mcpd failed with
error '011b0004:3: Initial subscription for system configuration failed with error '''
Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 err csyncd[3851]: 013b0004:3: IO error on recv from mcpd connection lost .............skipping more logs..... Sep 26 20:51:30 local/lb-d-1 notice sod[3925]: 01140030:5: HA proc_running bcm56xxd is
now responding.
Sep 26 20:51:34 local/lb-d-1 notice sod[3925]: 01140030:5: HA proc_running mcpd is now responding. Sep 26 20:51:34 local/lb-d-1 notice sod[3925]: 010c0018:5: Standby
Which daemon failed?
Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 notice promptstatusd[3695]: 01460006:5: semaphore mcpd.running(1) held
Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 notice promptstatusd[3695]: 01460006:5:
Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 warning promptstatusd[3695]: 01460005:4: mcpd.running(1) held, wait for mcpd
Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 info sod[3925]: 010c0009:6: Lost connection to mcpd reestablishing.
Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 err bcm56xxd[3847]: 012c0004:3: Lost connection with MCP: 16908291 ... Exiting bsx_connect.cpp(174)
Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 info bcm56xxd[3847]: 012c0012:6: MCP Exit Status Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 info bcm56xxd[3847]: 012c0012:6: Info: LACP stats (time now:1348717868) : no traffic
Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 info bcm56xxd[3847]: 012c0014:6: Exiting...
Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 err lind[3842]: 013c0004:3: IO error on recv from mcpd connection lost Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 notice bigd[3837]: 01060110:5: Lost connection to mcpd with
error 16908291, will reinit connection.
Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 err statsd[3857]: 011b0004:3: Initial subscription for system configuration failed with error '' Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 err statsd[3857]: 011b0001:3: Connection to mcpd failed with
error '011b0004:3: Initial subscription for system configuration failed with error '''
Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 err csyncd[3851]: 013b0004:3: IO error on recv from mcpd connection lost .............skipping more logs..... Sep 26 20:51:30 local/lb-d-1 notice sod[3925]: 01140030:5: HA proc_running bcm56xxd is
now responding.
Sep 26 20:51:34 local/lb-d-1 notice sod[3925]: 01140030:5: HA proc_running mcpd is now responding. Sep 26 20:51:34 local/lb-d-1 notice sod[3925]: 010c0018:5: Standby
Which daemon failed?
301b Exam Question 113
An LTM Specialist is tasked with ensuring that the syslogs for the LTM device are sent to a remote syslog server.
The following is an extract from the config file detailing the node and monitor that the LTM device is using for the remote syslog server:
monitor
Syslog_15002 {
defaults from udp
dest *:15002
}
node 91.223.45.231 {
monitor Syslog_15002
screen RemoteSYSLOG
}
There seem to be problems communicating with the remote syslog server. However, the pool monitor shows that the remote server is up.
The network department has confirmed that there are no firewall rules or networking issues preventing the LTM device from communicating with the syslog server. The department responsible for the remote syslog server indicates that there may be problems with the syslog server. The LTM Specialist checks the BIG-IP LTM logs for errors relating to the remote syslog server. None are found. The LTM Specialist does a tcpdump:
tcpdump -nn port 15002, with the following results:
21:28:36.395543 IP 192.168.100.100.44772 > 91.223.45.231.15002: UDP, length 19
21:28:36.429073 IP 192.168.100.100.39499 > 91.223.45.231.15002: UDP, length 169
21:28:36.430714 IP 192.168.100.100.39499 > 91.223.45.231.15002: UDP, length 181
21:28:36.840524 IP 192.168.100.100.39499 > 91.223.45.231.15002: UDP, length 169
21:28:36.846547 IP 192.168.100.100.39499 > 91.223.45.231.15002: UDP, length 181
21:28:39.886343 IP 192.168.100.100.39499 > 91.223.45.231.15002: UDP, length 144 NotE. 192.168.100.100 is the self IP of the LTM device.
Why are there no errors for the remote syslog server in the log files?
The following is an extract from the config file detailing the node and monitor that the LTM device is using for the remote syslog server:
monitor
Syslog_15002 {
defaults from udp
dest *:15002
}
node 91.223.45.231 {
monitor Syslog_15002
screen RemoteSYSLOG
}
There seem to be problems communicating with the remote syslog server. However, the pool monitor shows that the remote server is up.
The network department has confirmed that there are no firewall rules or networking issues preventing the LTM device from communicating with the syslog server. The department responsible for the remote syslog server indicates that there may be problems with the syslog server. The LTM Specialist checks the BIG-IP LTM logs for errors relating to the remote syslog server. None are found. The LTM Specialist does a tcpdump:
tcpdump -nn port 15002, with the following results:
21:28:36.395543 IP 192.168.100.100.44772 > 91.223.45.231.15002: UDP, length 19
21:28:36.429073 IP 192.168.100.100.39499 > 91.223.45.231.15002: UDP, length 169
21:28:36.430714 IP 192.168.100.100.39499 > 91.223.45.231.15002: UDP, length 181
21:28:36.840524 IP 192.168.100.100.39499 > 91.223.45.231.15002: UDP, length 169
21:28:36.846547 IP 192.168.100.100.39499 > 91.223.45.231.15002: UDP, length 181
21:28:39.886343 IP 192.168.100.100.39499 > 91.223.45.231.15002: UDP, length 144 NotE. 192.168.100.100 is the self IP of the LTM device.
Why are there no errors for the remote syslog server in the log files?
301b Exam Question 114
-- Exhibit -


-- Exhibit -
Refer to the exhibits.
An LTM device has been configured for load balancing a number of different application servers. Configuration changes need to be made to the LTM device to allow administrative management of the servers in 172.16.10/24, 172.16.20/24, and 172.16.30/24 networks. The servers require outbound access to numerous destinations for operations.
Which solution has the simplest configuration changes while maintaining functionality and basic security?


-- Exhibit -
Refer to the exhibits.
An LTM device has been configured for load balancing a number of different application servers. Configuration changes need to be made to the LTM device to allow administrative management of the servers in 172.16.10/24, 172.16.20/24, and 172.16.30/24 networks. The servers require outbound access to numerous destinations for operations.
Which solution has the simplest configuration changes while maintaining functionality and basic security?