Internet clients connecting to a virtual server to download a file are experiencing about 150 ms of latency and no packet loss.
Which built-in client-side TCP profile provides the highest throughput?

The LTM device is configured to provide load balancing to a set of web servers that implement access control lists (ACL) based on the source IP address of the client. The ACL is at the network level and the web server is configured to send a TCP reset back to the client if it is NOT permitted to connect.
The virtual server is configured with the default OneConnect profile.
The ACL is defined on the web server as:
Permit: 192.168.136.0/24 Deny: 192.168.116.0/24
The packet capture is taken of two individual client flows to a virtual server with IP address
192.168.136.100.
Client A - Src IP 192.168.136.1 - Virtual Server 192.168.136.100:
Clientside:
09:35:11.073623 IP 192.168.136.1.55684 > 192.168.136.100.80: S 869998901:869998901(0) win
8192 <mss 1460,nop,wscale 2,nop,nop,sackOK>
09:35:11.073931 IP 192.168.136.100.80 > 192.168.136.1.55684: S 2273668949:2273668949(0)
ack 869998902 win 4380 <mss 1460,nop,wscale 0,sackOK,eol>
09:35:11.074928 IP 192.168.136.1.55684 > 192.168.136.100.80: . ack 1 win 16425 09:35:11.080936 IP 192.168.136.1.55684 > 192.168.136.100.80: P 1:299(298) ack 1 win 16425 09:35:11.081029 IP 192.168.136.100.80 > 192.168.136.1.55684: . ack 299 win 4678
Serverside:
09:35:11.081022 IP 192.168.136.1.55684 > 192.168.116.128.80: S 685865802:685865802(0) win
4380 <mss 1460,nop,wscale 0,sackOK,eol>
09:35:11.081928 IP 192.168.116.128.80 > 192.168.136.1.55684: S 4193259095:4193259095(0)
ack 685865803 win 5840 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 6>
09:35:11.081943 IP 192.168.136.1.55684 > 192.168.116.128.80: . ack 1 win 4380 09:35:11.081955 IP 192.168.136.1.55684 > 192.168.116.128.80: P 1:299(298) ack 1 win 4380 09:35:11.083765 IP 192.168.116.128.80 > 192.168.136.1.55684: . ack 299 win 108
Client B - Src IP 192.168.116.1 - Virtual Server 192.168.136.100:
Clientside:
09:36:11.244040 IP 192.168.116.1.55769 > 192.168.136.100.80: S 3320618938:3320618938(0)
win 8192 <mss 1460,nop,wscale 2,nop,nop,sackOK>
09:36:11.244152 IP 192.168.136.100.80 > 192.168.116.1.55769: S 3878120666:3878120666(0)
ack 3320618939 win 4380 <mss 1460,nop,wscale 0,sackOK,eol>
09:36:11.244839 IP 192.168.116.1.55769 > 192.168.136.100.80: . ack 1 win 16425 09:36:11.245830 IP 192.168.116.1.55769 > 192.168.136.100.80: P 1:299(298) ack 1 win 16425 09:36:11.245922 IP 192.168.136.100.80 > 192.168.116.1.55769: . ack 299 win 4678
Serverside:
09:36:11.245940 IP 192.168.136.1.55684 > 192.168.116.128.80: P 599:897(298) ack 4525 win 09:36:11.247847 IP 192.168.116.128.80 > 192.168.136.1.55684: P 4525:5001(476) ack 897 win
Why was the second client flow permitted by the web server?

-- Exhibit -

-- Exhibit -
Refer to the exhibit.
Which profile could be removed or changed on this virtual server to reduce CPU load on the LTM device without increasing server side bandwidth usage?

An LTM HTTP pool has an associated monitor that sends a string equal to 'GET /test.html'.
Which two configurations could an LTM Specialist implement to allow server administrators to disable their pool member servers without logging into the LTM device? (Choose two.)

-- Exhibit- -- Exhibit -


Refer to the exhibits.
A customer requests to offload SSL for an internal website. The front page of the website loads correctly; however, selecting links on the page fails.
How should the LTM Specialist fix the issue?