FortiSandbox Deployment:
FortiSandbox for AWS deploys new EC2 instances to create isolated environments where it can safely execute and analyze suspicious files. These instances run custom Windows and Linux virtual machines specifically configured for sandboxing (Option D).
Sandboxing Process:
The process involves sending potential malware to these isolated VMs, executing it, and monitoring its behavior to detect malicious activities. The results are then captured and analyzed to provide detailed threat intelligence.
Other Options Analysis:
Option A is incorrect because FortiSandbox for AWS operates entirely within the AWS environment and does not require an on-premises manager.
Option B is incorrect as the FortiSandbox manager is not installed on the AWS platform for managing on-premises instances.
Option C is incorrect because FortiSandbox requires sufficient resources to perform the actual sandboxing and analysis tasks.
Reference:
FortiSandbox for AWS Documentation: FortiSandbox
Sandboxing Concepts: Sandboxing

Dynamic Address Object Update:
The debug output shows that the IP address of the AWS Windows Server Lab has been updated automatically, indicating that the dynamic address object feature is working as intended. This allows FortiGate to adapt to changes in the IP addresses of AWS instances dynamically (Option A).
SDN Connector Configuration:
The messages in the debug output confirm that the SDN connector is able to retrieve instance information and update the firewall address objects successfully. This implies that the SDN connector is correctly configured and has the necessary permissions (Option C).
Manual Change and Permissions:
Option B is incorrect because while the address object could theoretically be changed manually, this is not inferred from the debug output.
Option D is incorrect because the debug output does not indicate that the AWS user account must have full administrative rights. The required permissions are typically more scoped to specific actions related to SDN.
Reference:
FortiGate AWS Integration Guide: FortiGate on AWS
AWS IAM Policies for SDN: AWS IAM Policies

Enhanced Redundancy:
Deploying an active-passive (A-P) FortiGate cluster across two availability zones (AZs) provides enhanced redundancy by ensuring that if one AZ fails, the other can take over, maintaining high availability and uptime.
IP Addressing and Subnetting:
One of the major differences when deploying across different AZs compared to the same AZ is that IP addressing and subnetting are not shared between the instances. Each AZ operates independently with its own set of subnets and IP addresses, which must be managed separately (Option D).
Other Options Analysis:
Option A is incorrect because the FortiGate devices in an A-P setup do not act as a single logical instance; they operate in a failover setup.
Option B is incorrect because secondary IP address configuration is used in both single AZ and multi-AZ deployments.
Option C is incorrect because the number of subnets required is typically more when deploying across multiple AZs for redundancy.
Reference:
FortiGate HA Configuration Guide: FortiGate HA
AWS Availability Zones: AWS AZ

Understanding the Architecture:
The architecture includes an EC2 instance in a private subnet, a Gateway Load Balancer Endpoint (GWLBe), a NAT Gateway (NAT GW), and an Internet Gateway (IGW).
Route Tables and Routing:
The private route table for the subnet containing the EC2 instance has a route pointing to the GWLBe for internet-bound traffic.
The public route table for the subnet containing the NAT Gateway has routes to the IGW.
Traffic Flow Analysis:
Traffic initiated from the EC2 instance destined for the internet will first be routed to the GWLBe as per the private route table.
The GWLBe will forward the traffic to the NAT Gateway.
The NAT Gateway will then route the traffic to the IGW, which finally sends the traffic to the internet.
Comparison with Other Options:
Option A suggests direct routing to the NAT GW from the EC2 instance, which is incorrect.
Option B incorrectly states there is no route to the internet in the private route table.
Option D suggests direct routing from GWLBe to the internet, which is not the case.
Reference:
AWS Documentation on Route Tables: AWS Route Tables
Gateway Load Balancer Overview: AWS Gateway Load Balancer