TheFortiNAC-F Manager (FortiNAC-M)is designed as a centralized management platform for large-scale distributed environments where multiple FortiNAC-F Control and Application (CA) appliances are deployed across different sites. According to theFortiNAC-F Manager Administration Guide, the deployment of a Manager simplifies administrative overhead in three specific ways:
First, it providesGlobal Version Control (B). The Manager serves as a central repository for firmware and software updates, allowing administrators to push specific versions to all managed CAs simultaneously, ensuring consistency across the entire fabric. Second, it enablesPooled Licenses (D). Instead of purchasing and managing individual licenses for every CA, licenses are centralized on the Manager. The Manager then distributes these licenses to the CAs as needed based on their host counts. This " floating " license model optimizes cost and prevents individual sites from running out of capacity while others have excess. Third, it offersGlobal Visibility (E). The Manager aggregates host and device data from every managed CA into a single console. This " single pane of glass " allows an administrator to search for a specific MAC address or user across the entire global organization without logging into individual servers.
While the Manager can assist with configuration templates, authentication security policies (C) and infrastructure modeling (A) are still predominantly managed at the local CA level to ensure site-specific logic and performance.
" The FortiNAC Manager provides a central management console for multiple FortiNAC-F servers (CAs).
Key benefits include: *License Management: Licenses are pooled on the Manager and allocated to managed CAs as needed. *Software Management: Firmware updates can be centrally managed and pushed to all CAs from the Manager. *Centralized Monitoring: Provides a global view of all hosts, adapters, and events across the entire managed environment. " -FortiNAC-F Manager Administration Guide: Overview and Benefits.

FortiNAC-F requires both source-device recognition and a parser capable of interpreting the vendor- specific syslog structure .
First, the sending device must be modeled in Network > Inventory using the IP address that FortiNAC-F will see as the source of the messages. The FortiNAC-F 7.6 Administrator Study Guide explicitly states that a security device sending alerts must be modeled in Inventory using the source IP address. This prevents FortiNAC-F from accepting arbitrary syslog/security-event traffic from unrecognized sources.
Second, because the vendor is unknown or unsupported, the administrator must create a custom Security Event Parser under System > Settings > System Communication > Security Event Parsers . The guide states that adding a new parser enables support for virtually any device producing CSV, CEF, or Tag/Value- formatted syslog .
After modeling the device, its Incoming Events setting is associated with the appropriate parser.
Option A is unrelated to security-device integration. Option C is incorrect because Log Receivers define external destinations that receive FortiNAC-F-generated logs; they do not configure inbound syslog processing.
Study Guide Reference: Security Device Integration and Automated Response - Integration Using Syslog Messages; Security Event Parsers , pp. 316-318, 338-339 .

In FortiNAC-F, theLayer 3 Network typeis specifically designed for deployments where the isolation networks-such as Registration, Remediation, and Dead End-are separated from the FortiNAC appliance ' s service interface (port2) by one or more routers. This architecture is common in large, distributed enterprise environments where endpoints in different physical locations or branches must be isolated into subnets that are local to their respective network equipment.
The reason the Configuration Wizard allows for more than one DHCP scope for a single isolation network type (state) is thatthere can be more than one isolation network of each typeacross the infrastructure. For instance, if an organization has three different sites, each site might require its own unique Layer 3 registration subnet to ensure efficient routing and to accommodate local IP address management. By allowing multiple scopes for the " Registration " state, FortiNAC can provide the appropriate IP address, gateway, and DNS settings to a rogue host regardless of which site ' s registration VLAN it is placed into.
When an endpoint is isolated, the network infrastructure (via DHCP Relay/IP Helper) directs the DHCP request to the FortiNAC service interface. FortiNAC then identifies which scope to use based on the incoming request ' s gateway information. This flexibility ensures that the system is not limited to a single flat subnet for each isolation state, supporting a scalable, multi-routed network topology.
" Multiple scopes are allowed for each isolation state (Registration, Remediation, Dead End, VPN, Authentication, Isolation, and Access Point Management). Within these scopes, multiple ranges in the lease pool are also permitted... This configWizard option is used when Isolation Networks are separated from the FortiNAC Appliance ' s port2 interface by a router. " -FortiNAC-F Configuration Wizard Reference Manual:
Layer 3 Network Section.

The correct answer is C . In a link-trap-based wired deployment, the switch sends a linkUp or linkDown SNMP trap to FortiNAC-F, but that trap does not contain the endpoint MAC address. After receiving the link trap, FortiNAC-F must contact the switch and perform a Layer 2 poll to read the forwarding table and determine which MAC address was added or removed on the port. The FortiNAC-F study guide states that link traps trigger FortiNAC-F to perform a Layer 2 poll to update its awareness of devices connected to the edge device, and the wired link-trap workflow specifically shows FortiNAC-F performing a Layer 2 poll before locating the host record and provisioning access.
The symptoms in the exhibit are classic stale Layer 2 visibility: FortiNAC-F still shows a rogue host on a port where no host is connected, while also failing to show hosts on ports where endpoints are actually connected.
That means FortiNAC-F is not successfully refreshing the switch MAC table information. Since link traps depend on FortiNAC-F being able to poll the switch after the trap, a contact failure with the modeled switch is the most likely cause.
Option A is wrong because logical network settings affect access enforcement, not whether FortiNAC-F can see current MAC-to-port mappings. Option B is wrong because the FortiNAC-F agent is not required for basic switch-port visibility; Layer 2 visibility comes from switch polling, MAC notification traps, or RADIUS. Option D is tempting, but the broader failure shown here is not merely a policy or endpoint-side issue-it is that FortiNAC-F cannot obtain current Layer 2 data from the switch. In practice, you would still verify SNMP/CLI credentials while troubleshooting, but the best answer to the symptom pattern is that FortiNAC-F cannot contact/query the switch successfully.