A customer has deployed a hyperconverged environment based on HPE Simplivity at a number of their sites.
Before migrating workloads to the environment, you ask them about the backup policies In an HPE simpliVity solution to protect the actual data is this a design consideration that you should mention to your customer?
Solution:The preference of COW (Copy-On-Write) or ROW (Redirect-On-Write) -based snapshots

Does this option describe a valid scenario for using the 3-2-1 data protection rule or the 3-2-1-1-0 data protection rule?
Solution:You Intend to use at least 3 different types of on-premises storage

Your customer contacts you about replacing their aging tape library The backup solution ts equipped with Micro Focus Data Protector, which is protecting data on an HPE Nimble storage array. You suggest using the HPE StoreOnce disk based backup appliances as the new backup target Is this a correct statement regarding the use Of HPE StoreOnce backup appliances In combination with Micro Focus Data Protector?
Solution: Micro Focus Data protector has HPE StoreOnce Cloud Bank integration which allows seamless schedule object copy jobs for automatic transfer to the cloud.

You are working with your customer on the advantages and disadvantages of various data protection schemes They currently have a storage solution with 2 HPE 3PAR arrays with Peer Persistence This is used to make backups to an HPE StoreOnce VTL backup target using Commvauft Will this recommendation enhance the data protection plan?
Solution: Use the Grandfather-Father-Son (GFS) rotation scheme

A customer wants to replace an aging tape-based backup platform using a Grandfather-Father-Son (GFS) rotation scheme. They are considering replacing the entire solution with public cloud storage as a backup target Is this a valid recommendation for this customer?
Solution: Avoid using public cloud storage as a target in this scenario, since they cannot deliver the same SLAs as the local on-premises backup solution based on HPE StoreEver