The correct answer is B because continuous monitoring is a core component of AI governance that ensures systems remain effective, reliable, and aligned with their intended objectives over time. AI systems can degrade due to data drift, model drift, or changing real-world conditions, making ongoing performance tracking essential. Monitoring allows organizations to detect anomalies, biases, or performance issues and take corrective actions such as retraining or recalibration. Governance frameworks emphasize post- deployment oversight to ensure systems continue to operate safely and within acceptable risk thresholds.
Option A incorrectly suggests fully autonomous evolution without oversight, which contradicts governance principles. Options C and D address specific operational concerns but do not capture the primary purpose of continuous monitoring, which is maintaining performance, accountability, and alignment with defined goals.

The correct answer is D, model disgorgement. This technique refers to removing or eliminating the influence of improperly obtained, biased, or unlawfully used data from a trained machine learning model. It is increasingly discussed in AI governance and regulatory enforcement, particularly where models have been trained on data collected without proper consent or in violation of legal requirements. Instead of merely cleaning datasets, model disgorgement may require retraining or discarding the model entirely to ensure that problematic data no longer influences outputs. This aligns with accountability and compliance principles in AI governance, where organizations must ensure lawful data use throughout the AI lifecycle. Other options like data cleansing and de-duplication address data quality but do not fully remove learned patterns already embedded in trained models.

The correct answer isEngagement of a cross-functional team. Effective AI governance requires collaboration among various organizational functions including legal, compliance, IT, ethics, and data science.
From the AIGP Body of Knowledge:
"AI governance cannot be siloed-it requires input and oversight from across departments... A cross- functional team ensures that ethical, technical, legal, and operational risks are all appropriately managed." Also confirmed in the ILT Participant Guide:
"Cross-functional teams allow organizations to bring in different perspectives... Legal, compliance, and technical experts must work together to ensure responsible AI outcomes."

Forcustomizable, interpretable modelsthat allow organizations toretain control and avoid vendor lock-in, classic ML models(e.g., regression, decision trees, random forests) are optimal.
From theAI Governance in Practice Report2025:
"Organizations seeking transparency, customizability, and control often prefer classic ML models due to their flexibility and ease of governance." (p. 33)
* AandCmay have limited transparency and are often tied to specific providers.
* Dinvolves ongoing costs and limited model control.

The correct answer is A because having a well-defined incident management process enables organizations to respond quickly and effectively when AI-related issues arise. AI governance frameworks emphasize incident management plans as a key component of operational governance, ensuring that risks such as system failures, harmful outputs, or security breaches are promptly identified, escalated, and resolved. A structured process reduces delays by clearly defining roles, responsibilities, and response procedures, thereby minimizing potential harm and operational disruption. While incident processes may also indirectly support compliance and reduce the impact of failures, their primary benefit is improving responsiveness and coordination.
Efficient response times are critical in maintaining trust, ensuring safety, and limiting negative consequences in real-world AI deployments.