Danny purchases a $1,000,000 whole life insurance policy. He names his three daughters, Donna-Joe, Stephanie, and Michelle, as revocable beneficiaries with each receiving one-third of the death benefit. If Michelle predeceases Danny, and Danny did not have a chance to modify his beneficiary designation, how will Danny's death benefit be paid out?
Correct Answer: A
When a beneficiary is designated as "revocable" and predeceases the policyholder, their share of the benefit typically reverts to the surviving beneficiaries rather than the deceased beneficiary's estate. In this case, since Michelle has predeceased Danny, her portion of the benefit is divided equally between Donna-Joe and Stephanie, the remaining beneficiaries. Therefore, each of them would receive 50% of the total death benefit, which is $500,000. If the beneficiaries had been designated as "irrevocable" or if there were specific contingent beneficiaries, different rules might apply.
LLQP Exam Question 92
Samya and Gary, who are both insurance representatives, are having lunch together. Gary has been very successful for several years and proposes a scheme to Samya to get insurance proposals signed for a fictional company they would create together. He believes that this system would make them millionaires in about ten years. Gary advises Samya to keep their conversation a secret. If Samya agrees to Gary's proposal, what sanctions could she face?
Correct Answer: C
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation: Gary's scheme involves creating a fictional company to fraudulently sell insurance, constituting fraud under the Criminal Code of Canada (Section 380), punishable by up to 14 years imprisonment if Samya participates. Option C reflects this severe legal consequence. Option A (CSF sanctions) applies to ethical breaches within professional conduct, like fines or suspension, but fraud exceeds this scope. Option B (Distribution Act penalties) includes fines up to $175,000 (Section 458), not $1,000,000, and is less severe than criminal charges. Option D (liability insurance) is irrelevant, as it doesn't mitigate criminal liability. The Ethics manual and LLQP prohibit fraudulent acts, emphasizing criminal repercussions for such schemes. References: Criminal Code, Section 380; Distribution Act, Section 458; Ethics and Professional Practice (Civil Law) Manual, Section on Fraud and Misconduct.
LLQP Exam Question 93
Sebastian is a 44-year-old sales representative employed at Premier Aqua. He wants to take a year off to travel and relax. He has worked for the company for 25 years and accumulated $230,000 in a deferred profit sharing plan (DPSP). He would like to know if he can use some of the funds in his DPSP to fund his sabbatical.
Correct Answer: D
As with most Deferred Profit Sharing Plan (DPSP) funds, Sebastian's accumulated balance is generally locked-in, which means it cannot be withdrawn in cash while still under the plan. Instead, he may transfer it to a Locked-In Retirement Account (LIRA) upon leaving his employment or retiring, ensuring the funds remain tax-deferred. LLQP guidelines state that DPSP funds are generally subject to locking-in provisions, which restrict withdrawals and are specifically aimed at providing retirement income. Thus, contrary to options A and B, Sebastian cannot withdraw the DPSP funds for discretionary purposes, such as funding his sabbatical, because of these restrictions. Option C is incorrect, as transferring to a Life Income Fund (LIF) would only be appropriate once the funds are in a LIRA, typically when Sebastian is closer to retirement age and ready to begin income withdrawals.
LLQP Exam Question 94
Alec is sure he sent his insurer his annual life insurance premium payment. The insurer did not receive it, however. The insurer then sent Alec a notice of non-payment of premiums, but Alec had moved in the meantime. Therefore, he never got the notice, even though he had emailed hisfinancial security advisor, Olivier, to inform him of his change of address. Unfortunately, Olivier was on a leave of absence and no one else in the firm took over the file. As a result, the policy lapsed. Alec sent Olivier's firm several emails to complain, but no one responded. Which organization can Alec turn to?
Correct Answer: C
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation: Alec faces a lapsed policy due to communication failures involving his advisor and firm. The Autorite des marches financiers (AMF) regulates Quebec's financial advisors and firms under the Distribution Act (Sections 103-115), handling complaints about advisor negligence or firm unresponsiveness. Option C is correct, as the AMF can investigate Olivier's firm's failure to update Alec's address or respond. Option A (CLHIA) is an industry group without regulatory power. Option B (Chambre de la securite financiere) oversees advisor ethics but focuses on individual conduct, not firm-wide issues or insurer disputes. Option D (Assuris) protects policyholders if an insurer fails, not for lapses due to non-payment. The Ethics manual stresses advisors' duty to maintain client communication, supporting AMF jurisdiction here. References: Distribution Act, Sections 103-115; Ethics and Professional Practice (Civil Law) Manual, Section on Advisor Responsibilities.
LLQP Exam Question 95
Sergei meets with his insurance agent Nikita to purchase a $50,000 critical illness policy. Nikita explains that to apply for the policy Sergei would have to answer a series of personal questions about his finances, health, and lifestyle. Sergei is uncomfortable giving Nikita such detailed personal information. Nikita reassures Sergei by telling him that the insurer must follow stringent rules about how they can collect and handle this information. Which organization legislates privacy statutes pertaining to insurance companies?
Correct Answer: A
PIPEDA governs how private sector organizations, including insurance companies, collect, use, and disclose personal information in Canada. This Act mandates that insurers adhere to strict guidelines to ensure the protection of client information. Nikita is correct in assuring Sergei that his personal information is protected by privacy legislation, as PIPEDA sets out these obligations for private sector companies handling personal data.
