Cassie applies for a $100,000 renewable 10-year term insurance policy through Mason, her insurance of persons representative. A month later, when Mason meets with Cassie again to deliver her contract, Cassie says she had to have a biopsy the previous week for a persistent cough. Mason tells her not to worry because the policy is already accepted. He completes the policy delivery. Six months later, Mason receives a call from Cassie's boyfriend informing him that Cassie died of stage 4 throat cancer. How will the insurance company handle the claim?
Correct Answer: B
In this scenario, the policy was accepted and delivered to Cassie by Mason before her biopsy, indicating that she was considered insurable at the time of application. However, the insurance policy is subject to a two-year contestability period, during which the insurer can investigate the claim if they believe relevant information regarding the insured's health was omitted or misrepresented. According to LLQP guidelines, insurance contracts are built on the principle of utmost good faith, requiring that both the client and the representative disclose all material facts that may affect the insurance risk. If the insured's health status changes significantly between the application and delivery of the policy, it is the representative's duty to inform the insurer to reassess the risk. In this case, Mason, as the insurance representative, failed to disclose Cassie's new health condition, which is considered a material change to her insurability. Under LLQP ethics and practice standards, non-disclosure of this change can result in the insurer denying the claim, as it affected the underwriting decision. Therefore, due to the lack of disclosure by Mason, the insurance company would have grounds to deny the claim based on this material change in insurability, aligning with LLQP provisions and insurance contract law.
LLQP Exam Question 2
Josh is a successful insurance agent with Smart Insurance Inc. who mentors new agents and gives them tips on how to increase their client base. He tells Clarence, a new agent, that he should send an email to close friends and family members to explain the services that he now offers. Clarence is worried about sending unsolicited promotional emails because Firash, the compliance manager, had told him that the practice is not allowed. What legislation was Firash correctly referencing?
Correct Answer: C
Canada's Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL) regulates the sending of commercial electronic messages (CEMs) without the recipient's consent. CASL requires explicit consent before sending unsolicited promotional emails, even to friends and family, if the messages are for commercial purposes. Clarence's concern about compliance with CASL is valid, as sending unsolicited emails could result in penalties for violating this legislation. PIPEDA and the Privacy Act relate to privacy and personal information protection but do not specifically address unsolicited electronic communications.
LLQP Exam Question 3
Konrad is the owner of CrossBoy, a manufacturing company employing over 50 employees. Konrad recently took out a $500,000 loan to expand his business. Terrence works as a sales manager and is responsible for roughly 40% of the company's revenue. Konrad recognizes the importance of Terrence's contributions to the success of the company. Therefore, in addition to a sizeable basesalary, CrossBoy also pays Terrence regular performance-based bonuses. Konrad understands that if Terrence dies prematurely, CrossBoy would suffer financially. What should he do to protect his company?
Correct Answer: C
Key person life insurance is designed to protect a business from financial losses resulting from the death of a key employee. In this case, Terrence's role is crucial to CrossBoy's success due to his substantial contribution to the company's revenue. By purchasing key person insurance on Terrence, Konrad can ensure that the company has the necessary funds to cover the financial impact of Terrence's potential loss. Other options, like offering a group life insurance plan (A), do not directly address the specific financial risk associated with the loss of a key employee.Therefore,Option Cis the appropriate choice.
LLQP Exam Question 4
Which organization provides protection for holders of segregated fund contracts in Canada if the insurer becomes insolvent?
Correct Answer: C
Assuris provides protection to Canadian policyholders, including holders of segregated fund contracts, if their insurance company becomes insolvent. Assuris is a not-for-profit organization that safeguards policyholders by ensuring that they continue to receive guaranteed benefits within specified limits. This organization is essential for maintaining confidence in the Canadian insurance industry, offering peace of mind to policyholders that their segregated fund contracts are protectedunder such circumstances. Neither the Canadian Deposit Insurance Corporation nor the OmbudService for Life & Health Insurance provides this specific type of insolvency protection for segregated funds.
LLQP Exam Question 5
Rowan works for a construction company that employs 40 employees. The company is newly established, and the owners have yet to implement a group insurance policy. Rowan falls off the side of a building and breaks his collar bone. The doctor informs him that he will be unable to work for five months. Who will pay him disability benefits while he is recuperating?
Correct Answer: D
In this scenario, Rowan, an employee of a construction company, suffers an injury while on the job. Since the injury occurred in the workplace, he would be eligible for benefits under Workers' Compensation. Workers' Compensation is designed to cover employees who suffer work-related injuries or illnesses, providing them with benefits that include coverage for medical expenses and income replacement during their period of disability. As the accident happened while Rowan was performing work duties, Workers' Compensation will likely cover his wage loss for the duration he is unable to work due to the injury. Employment Insurance (EI) would not be applicable here, as EI sickness benefits are intended for non-work-related illnesses or injuries. The Canada Pension Plan (CPP) also would not apply, as it provideslong-term disability benefits primarily for severe and prolonged disabilities that prevent individuals from working in any capacity. Therefore, option D is the correct answer, as Workers' Compensation is specifically designed for cases like Rowan's.
