It would be appropriate for an internal audit activity to use consultants with expertise in health-care benefits when the internal audit activity is:
I. Conducting an audit of the organization's estimate of its liability for post retirement benefits, which include health care benefits.
II. Comparing the cost of the organization's health care program with that of other programs offered in the industry.
III. Training its staff to conduct an audit of health care costs in a major division of the organization.

Which of the following situations allows for the most objectivity on the part of an internal auditor?

Two individuals are being considered for an audit team that is to perform a highly technical review. Which of the following situations would preclude selection of the individual for the audit due to an objectivity concern?
I. Person A is a member of the internal audit staff and has the required technical skills. Person A participated in a controls review of the system to be audited when it was being developed.
II. Person B is a technical specialist who understands the audit area but is not a member of the internal audit staff. Although person B has personal credibility in the information systems department to be audited, person B works for another department in the organization.

An engagement supervisor notes that an internal auditor usually documents and submits draft audit reports for review without giving the process owners the opportunity to state their position on the issues raised. How should the engagement supervisor respond?

The accounting department asked the chief audit executive (CAE) to perform a review of suspicious transactions The CAE was an accounting manager for the organization six months ago How should she respond to the request?