The best IT governance action to minimize the likelihood of IT failures jeopardizing the corporate value of an IT-dependent organization is to implement an IT risk management framework. An IT risk management framework is a set of policies, processes, and tools that help identify, analyze, evaluate, treat, monitor, and communicate the IT risks that may affect the achievement of the organization's objectives and goals. An IT risk management framework can help reduce the probability and impact of IT failures, such as system outages, data breaches, cyberattacks, or project delays, by implementing appropriate controls and mitigation strategies. An IT risk management framework can also help align the IT risks with the organization's risk appetite and tolerance, as well as ensure compliance with regulations and standards. What is IT Risk Management? | RSA provides an overview of IT risk management and its benefits.
Installing an IT continuous monitoring solution, defining IT performance management measures, and benchmarking IT strategy against industry peers are also useful IT governance actions, but they are not the best way to minimize the likelihood of IT failures. Installing an IT continuous monitoring solution is a process that uses software tools or systems to collect, analyze, and report on IT performance and compliance data, such as availability, reliability, security, or efficiency. Installing an IT continuous monitoring solution can help detect and respond to IT failures in a timely and effective manner, as well as improve the visibility and accountability of IT operations. Defining IT performance management measures is a task that involves selecting and defining the metrics that measure the achievement of specific goals or objectives for IT processes, systems, or services. Defining IT performance management measures can help evaluate and communicate the effectiveness and efficiency of IT operations, services, and projects, as well as their contribution to business value and customer satisfaction. Benchmarking IT strategy against industry peers is a technique that involves comparing and contrasting the IT practices, capabilities, or outcomes of an organization with those of its competitors or similar organizations. Benchmarking IT strategy against industry peers can help identify and adopt best practices or innovations for IT governance and management, as well as assess the strengths and weaknesses of the organization's IT performance.

Assurance of the execution of business controls is the primary element in sustaining an effective governance framework, as it ensures that the IT governance processes and activities are performed in accordance with the established policies, standards, and procedures. Assurance also provides feedback and monitoring on the performance, compliance, and outcomes of the IT governance framework, and identifies areas for improvement and optimization12. Reference:= CGEIT Exam Content Outline, Domain 1, Subtopic A: Governance Framework, Task 5: Ensure that assurance processes are established to provide confidence that the IT governance framework is designed and operating effectively.

The first step to address the concern of discrimination against certain demographic groups resulting from the use of machine learning models is to obtain stakeholders' input regarding the ethics associated with machine learning. This is because stakeholders are the ones who are affected by or have an interest in the outcomes of machine learning models, and their input can help identify the ethical values, principles, and standards that should guide the development and use of machine learning models. Stakeholders' input can also help ensure that the machine learning models are aligned with the enterprise's mission, vision, and goals, as well as the legal and regulatory requirements. According to COBIT 5, one of the seven enablers of IT governance is stakeholders1. The Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelligence project also emphasizes the importance of engaging with diverse stakeholders to ensure that AI systems are fair, accountable, transparent, and human-centric2. Reference := 1: COBIT 5: A Business Framework for the Governance and Management of Enterprise IT, ISACA, page 312: Algorithms and Justice - Berkman Klein Center

Section: Volume A