A, and B are incorrect. These all choices vary subjectively.

Explanation/Reference:
Explanation:
Quantitative risk analysis is generally more complex and thus is costlier than qualitative risk analysis.
Incorrect Answers:
A: Neither of the two risk analysis methods is fully objective. Qualitative method subjectively assigns high, medium and low frequency and impact categories to a specific risk, whereas quantitative method subjectivity expressed in mathematical "weights".
C: To be effective, both processes require personnel who have a good understanding of the business. So there is equal requirement of skilled personnel in both.
D: Quantitative analysis generally has a better buy-in than qualitative analysis to the point where it can cause over-reliance on the results. Hence this option is not correct.

B, and C are incorrect. These all are true for KRIs. Key Risk Indicators are the prime monitoring indicators of the enterprise. KRIs are highly relevant and possess a high probability of predicting or indicating important risk. KRIs help in avoiding excessively large number of risk indicators to manage and report that a large enterprise may have. The complete set of KRIs should also balance indicators for risk, root causes and business impact, so as to indicate the risk and its impact completely.

When the risk events occur then following tasks have to done to react to it: Maintain incident response plans Monitor risk Initiate incident response Communicate lessons learned from risk events

is incorrect. Reducing risks to a specific return ignores the qualitative aspects of the risk
which should also be considered.