Section: Volume C
Explanation:
This is a positive risk response, as crashing is an example of enhancing. You are enhancing the probability of finishing the project early to realize the reward of bonus. Enhancing doesn't ensure positive risks, but it does increase the likelihood of the event.
Incorrect Answers:
A: Crashing is a positive risk response. Generally, crashing doesn't add risks and is often confused with other predominant schedule compression techniques of fast tracking - which does add risks.
C: This isn't an example of exploiting. Exploiting is an action to take advantage of a positive risk response that will happen.
D: Crashing does add costs, but in this instance, crashing is an example of the positive risk response of enhancing.

Section: Volume C
Explanation:
The activity duration estimates review is valuable in identifying risks associated to the time allowances for the activities or projects as a whole, with a width of the range indicating the degrees of risk.
Incorrect Answers:
B: The activity cost estimates review is valuable in identifying risks as it provides a quantitative assessment of the expected cost to complete scheduled activities and is expressed as a range, with a width of the range indicating the degrees of risk.
C: A Risk management plan is a document arranged by a project manager to estimate the effectiveness, predict risks, and build response plans to mitigate them. It also consists of the risk assessment matrix.
D: It describes how the schedule contingencies will be reported and assessed.

Section: Volume D