According to the CRISC Review Manual, performing the assessment as it would normally be done is the best approach when a risk practitioner has been asked by a business unit manager for special consideration during a risk assessment of a system, because it ensures that the risk practitioner maintains their objectivity, integrity, and professionalism. The risk practitioner should not compromise the quality or accuracy of the risk assessment, regardless of any external pressure or influence. The risk practitioner should follow the established risk assessment methodology and standards, and report the risk results and recommendations based on the facts and evidence. The other options are not the best approaches, because they may affect the credibility or reliability of the risk assessment. Conducting an abbreviated version of the assessment may result in incomplete or insufficient risk information, which may lead to poor risk decisions or actions.
Reporting the business unit manager for a possible ethics violation may escalate the situation or create a conflict of interest, which may hinder the risk assessment process or outcome. Recommending an internal auditor perform the review may transfer the responsibility or accountability of the risk practitioner, which may undermine their role or authority. References = CRISC Review Manual, 7th Edition, Chapter 2, Section 2.2.1, page 74.

Explanation/Reference:
Explanation:
Project manager responsibilities related to the change request approval process is judging the impact of each change request on project activities, schedule and budget, and also archiving copies of all change requests in the project file.
Incorrect Answers:
B: This is the responsibility of Change advisory board.
D: Pm has not the authority to formally accept the updated project plan. This is done by project sponsors so as to approve the change request.

Section: Volume C
Explanation:
Frameworks, standards and practices are necessary as:
* They provide a systematic view of "things to be considered" that could harm clients or an enterprise.
* They act as a guide to focus efforts of variant teams.
* They save time and revenue, such as training costs, operational costs and performance improvement costs.
* They assist in achieving business objectives quickly and easily.

The primary purpose of creating and documenting control procedures is to help manage risk to acceptable tolerance levels. Control procedures are the specific actions or steps that are performed to achieve the control objectives and mitigate the risks. Control procedures should be documented to provide clear guidance, consistency, and accountability for the control activities. Documenting control procedures also helps to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the controls, and to identify and address any gaps or weaknesses. The other options are not the primary purpose of creating and documenting control procedures, although they may be secondary benefits or outcomes. References = Risk and Information Systems Control Study Manual, Chapter 1, Section 1.3.2, page 1-15.