Explanation/Reference:
Explanation:
Inspection of FISMA is required to be done annually. Each year, agencies must have an independent evaluation of their program. The objective is to determine the effectiveness of the program. These evaluations include:
Testing for effectiveness: Policies, procedures, and practices are to be tested. This evaluation does not

test every policy, procedure, and practice. Instead, a representative sample is tested.
An assessment or report: This report identifies the agency's compliance as well as lists compliance with

FISMA. It also lists compliance with other standards and guidelines.
Incorrect Answers:
B, C, D: Auditing of compliance by external organization is done annually, not quarterly or every three years.

Explanation/Reference:
Explanation:
A risk fallback plan is a proper plan devised to identify definite action to be taken if the risk action plan (Risk Mitigation Plan) is not helpful. Fallback plan is important in Risk Response Planning. If the contingency plan for a risk is not successful, then the project team implements the fallback plan. Fall-back planning is intended for a known and specific activity that may perhaps fail to produce desired outcome. It is related with technical procedures and with the responsibility of the technical lead.
Incorrect Answers:
A, C, D: These all choices itself comes under risk action plan. As in the described scenario, risk action plan is not turned to be effective, these should not be implemented again.

Section: Volume D
Explanation

Section: Volume C
Explanation:
Loss of integrity refers to the following types of losses:
* An e-mail message is modified in transit A virus infects a file
* Someone makes unauthorized changes to a Web site
Incorrect Answers:
A: Someone sees company's secret formula or password comes under loss of confidentiality.

Segmenting the application within the existing network is the most effective control to manage a legacy application that relies on software that has reached the end of extended support, as it isolates the application from the rest of the network and reduces the attack surface and the potential impact of a compromise.
Subscribing to threat intelligence, applying patches for a newer version of the application, and increasing the frequency of regular system and data backups are not the most effective controls, as they may not address the root cause of the risk, or may introduce additional costs or complexities, respectively. References = CRISC Review Manual, 7th Edition, page 153.