Explanation/Reference:
After a test has been performed the most useful test results for manangement would be knowing what worked and what didn't so that they could correct the mistakes where needed.
The following answers are incorrect:
elapsed time to perform various activities. This is incorrect because it is not the best answer, these results are not as useful as list of successful and unsuccessful activities would be to managment.
amount of work completed. This is incorrect because it is not the best answer, these results are not as useful as list of successful and unsuccessful activities would be to managment.
description of each activity. This is incorrect because it is not the best answer, these results are not as useful as list of successful and unsuccessful activities would be to managment.

The above statement is NOT true and thus the correct answer. The
maximum key size on Rijndael is 256 bits.
There are some differences between Rijndael and the official FIPS-197 specification for
AES.
Rijndael specification per se is specified with block and key sizes that must be a multiple of
32 bits, both with a minimum of 128 and a maximum of 256 bits. Namely, Rijndael allows
for both key and block sizes to be chosen independently from the set of { 128, 160, 192,
224, 256 } bits. (And the key size does not in fact have to match the block size).
However, FIPS-197 specifies that the block size must always be 128 bits in AES, and that
the key size may be either 128, 192, or 256 bits. Therefore AES-128, AES-192, and AES-
256 are actually: Key Size (bits) Block Size (bits) AES-128 128 128 AES-192 192 128 AES-256 256 128
So in short:
Rijndael and AES differ only in the range of supported values for the block length and cipher key length.
For Rijndael, the block length and the key length can be independently specified to any multiple of 32 bits, with a minimum of 128 bits, and a maximum of 256 bits.
AES fixes the block length to 128 bits, and supports key lengths of 128, 192 or 256 bits only.
References used for this question:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/shawnfa/archive/2006/10/09/the-differences-between-rijndael-andaes.aspx and http://csrc.nist.gov/CryptoToolkit/aes/rijndael/Rijndael.pdf

Explanation/Reference:
The Domain Name Service is a distributed database system that is used to map domain names to IP addresses and IP addresses to domain names.
The Domain Name System is maintained by a distributed database system, which uses the client-server model. The nodes of this database are the name servers. Each domain has at least one authoritative DNS server that publishes information about that domain and the name servers of any domains subordinate to it. The top of the hierarchy is served by the root nameservers, the servers to query when looking up (resolving) a TLD.
Reference(s) used for this question:
KRUTZ, Ronald L & VINES, Russel D., The CISSP Prep Guide: Mastering the Ten Domains of Computer Security, 2001, John Wiley & Sons, Page 100.
and
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_Name_System

Explanation/Reference:
Synchronous dynamic password tokens generate a new unique password value at fixed time intervals, so the server and token need to be synchronized for the password to be accepted.
Source: KRUTZ, Ronald L. & VINES, Russel D., The CISSP Prep Guide: Mastering the Ten Domains of Computer Security, John Wiley & Sons, 2001, Chapter 2: Access control systems (page 37).
Also check out: HARRIS, Shon, All-In-One CISSP Certification Exam Guide, McGraw-Hill/Osborne, 2002, chapter 4: Access Control (page 136).

Explanation/Reference:
RESCORLA, Eric, SSL and TLS: Designing and Building Secure Systems, 2000, Addison Wesley Professional; SMITH, Richard E., Internet Cryptography, 1997, Addison-Wesley Pub Co.