MS-500 Exam Question 151
You have a Microsoft 365 E5 subscription and an Sentinel workspace named Sentinel1.
You need to launch the Guided investigation - Process Alerts notebooks= in Sentinel.
What should you create first?
You need to launch the Guided investigation - Process Alerts notebooks= in Sentinel.
What should you create first?
MS-500 Exam Question 152
You have a Microsoft 365 E5 subscription that contains two groups named Group1 and Group2 and the users shown in the following table.

You have the Privileged Access settings configured as shown in the following exhibit.

You have a privileged access policy that has the following settings:
* Policy name: New Transport Rule
* Policy type: Task
* Policy scope Exchange
* Approval Type: Manual
* Approver group: Group 1
User1 requests access to the New Transport Rule policy for a duration of two hours.
For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement is true. Otherwise, select No.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.


You have the Privileged Access settings configured as shown in the following exhibit.

You have a privileged access policy that has the following settings:
* Policy name: New Transport Rule
* Policy type: Task
* Policy scope Exchange
* Approval Type: Manual
* Approver group: Group 1
User1 requests access to the New Transport Rule policy for a duration of two hours.
For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement is true. Otherwise, select No.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

MS-500 Exam Question 153
You have a Microsoft 365 subscription that contains 1,000 user mailboxes.
An administrator named Admin1 must be able to search for the name of a competing company in the mailbox of a user named User5.
You need to ensure that Admin1 can search the mailbox of User5 successfully. The solution must prevent Admin1 from sending User5.
Solution: You assign the eDiscovery Manager role to Admin1, and then create an eDiscovery case.
Does this meet the goal?
An administrator named Admin1 must be able to search for the name of a competing company in the mailbox of a user named User5.
You need to ensure that Admin1 can search the mailbox of User5 successfully. The solution must prevent Admin1 from sending User5.
Solution: You assign the eDiscovery Manager role to Admin1, and then create an eDiscovery case.
Does this meet the goal?
MS-500 Exam Question 154
Your company has a main office and a Microsoft 365 subscription.
You need to enforce Microsoft Azure Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) by using conditional access for all users who are NOT physically present in the office.
What should you include in the configuration?
You need to enforce Microsoft Azure Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) by using conditional access for all users who are NOT physically present in the office.
What should you include in the configuration?
MS-500 Exam Question 155
Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.
After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.
You have a Microsoft 365 E5 subscription that contains a user named User1.
The Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) Identity Protection risky users report identifies User1.
For User1, you select Confirm user compromised.
User1 can still sign in.
You need to prevent User1 from signing in. The solution must minimize the impact on users at a lower risk level.
Solution: You configure the sign-in risk policy to block access when the sign-in risk level is high.
Does this meet the goal?
After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.
You have a Microsoft 365 E5 subscription that contains a user named User1.
The Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) Identity Protection risky users report identifies User1.
For User1, you select Confirm user compromised.
User1 can still sign in.
You need to prevent User1 from signing in. The solution must minimize the impact on users at a lower risk level.
Solution: You configure the sign-in risk policy to block access when the sign-in risk level is high.
Does this meet the goal?


