Explanation
A properly written requirement statement should be clear, concise, consistent, complete, and testable. It should specify what the product or service should do, not how it should do it. It should also avoid using ambiguous or vague words that could be interpreted differently by different stakeholders. Among the four options, only option C meets these criteria. Option C is a properly written requirement statement because it clearly and precisely defines the attribute of the pot (the colors) and the possible values for that attribute (yellow, red, brown, blue). It is also consistent with the standard terminology and format for requirement statements, and it is complete and testable, as it can be verified by inspection or measurement. Option A is not a properly written requirement statement because it uses ambiguous and vague words such as "lightweight" and "heat up quickly". These words do not specify the exact or measurable criteria for the pot's weight and heating time, and they could mean different things to different stakeholders. Option B is not a properly written requirement statement because it does not specify the conditions or constraints for the pot's usability in the oven or on the stove. For example, it does not state the maximum temperature or duration that the pot can withstand, or the type of oven or stove that the pot can be used on. Option D is not a properly written requirement statement because it does not specify the requirement for the pot itself, but rather for the company brand. The company brand is not a feature or function of the pot, but rather a marketing or branding strategy. The requirement statement should focus on the pot's characteristics and capabilities, not on the company's image or reputation. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA) Examination Content Outline1, PMI Guide to Business Analysis2, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide3, How To Write Good Requirements (With Example) - TestLodge Blog

Explanation
According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content, a traceability matrix is a tool that is used to track and link the requirements throughout the project life cycle. A traceability matrix can help to ensure that the product design meets the stated requirements by showing the relationships and dependencies between the requirements and the design elements, as well as the test cases and the verification results. A traceability matrix can also help to monitor the status and progress of the requirements and the design, and to identify and resolve any gaps, inconsistencies, or conflicts that may arise. A traceability matrix can also facilitate the impact analysis and change management of the requirements and the design. References:
PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content: PMI-PBA Certification PMI Professional in Business Analysis reference list: PBA Reference List PMI Professional in Business Analysis study guide: Study.com

Explanation
The requirements approval process is documented as a measure of effective decision making that allows the business analyst to finalize the process for requirement approval. The requirements approval process defines the roles, responsibilities, criteria, methods, and tools for approving the requirements and ensuring that they meet the stakeholder needs and expectations. The requirements approval process should be agreed upon by the stakeholders and the business analyst before the requirements are elicited, analyzed, and validated. The requirements verification process is not a measure of effective decision making, but a technique for ensuring that the requirements are complete, correct, consistent, and clear. The requirements elicitation process is not a measure of effective decision making, but a set of activities for discovering, gathering, and understanding the stakeholder needs and expectations. The requirements validation process is not a measure of effective decision making, but a technique for confirming that the requirements align with the business objectives and deliver value to the stakeholders. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 113-114 1; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)
Examination Content Outline, page 17 2.

Explanation
The person identified in the RACI matrix as accountable for deployment approval is the one who should be contacted by the business analyst to review the testing results and get approval to proceed with deployment.
The RACI matrix defines who is Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed for each task or deliverable in a project or a process. The accountable person has the authority and accountability to approve or reject the work. The tester identified in the testing strategy is not necessarily the one who can approve deployment, as they may only be responsible for conducting testing. The project manager identified in the project charter may not have the authority to approve deployment, as they may only be responsible for managing the project. The project sponsor identified in the scope document may not be involved in deployment approval, as they may only be informed of the project progress and outcomes.

Explanation
External dependencies are the factors or conditions that are outside the control of the project, but may affect its scope, schedule, cost, quality, or risks. External dependencies may include legal, regulatory, cultural, environmental, political, economic, or technological factors. An organization that is evaluating the possibility of conducting business internationally should investigate these factors at the onset of the initiative, as they may have significant impacts on the feasibility, viability, and desirability of the project. The other options are not factors that should be investigated at the onset of the initiative. Deliverables to be produced are the outputs or results of the project that meet the stakeholder requirements. Impacts on requirements baseline are the changes or deviations from the approved set of requirements that define the solution scope. Change control processes are the procedures and tools that manage how changes to the project scope, schedule, cost, quality, or risks are identified, evaluated, approved, implemented, and communicated. These factors are determined or addressed during the planning or execution phases of the project, not at the onset of the initiative. References:
PMI-PBA
Examination Content Outline, page 13; PMI-PBA
Reference List, page 1, BABOK
Guide v3,
page 39; 4.