Consider the following situation:
A PRPC application is running within a 1.2 GB JVM (Java Virtual Machine). There is approximately 350 MB of free memory and garbage collector reclaims in average 32 MB of memory in the course of an hour.
The Rules Assembly count is 0 when a typical interaction executes in average 72.6 rules. The application CPU peaks periodically at 22% but otherwise runs in average around 12%.
The application is generating approximatively 30 database alerts per minute. The database CPU runs at an average of 75% peaking periodically at 96%. The alert log file does not report any byte warning with a 10 MB threshold defined.
Users are complaining about poor performance. Their interactions take in average 4.5 seconds.
Which of the following approaches is most appropriate to resolve this issue? (Choose One)

In which of the following cases would you use Connect SQL rules? (Choose Two)

You are building a PRPC-based application. Knowing that PRPC is deployed as a web archive (WAR deployment), which of the following service Rules would you least likely be able to implement? (Choose One)

If there is a requirement to embed a 3rd-party API such as jQuery, which approach is recommended? (Choose One)

A framework rule has been overridden with a copy in the implementation layer. Both rules are in locked RuleSet versions. An architect wishes to restore the framework functionality.
Which of the following will NOT accomplish this? (Choose Two)