MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I Exam Question 101
Refer to the exhibit.
One of the backend systems invoked by an API implementation enforces rate limits on the number of requests a particular client can make. Both the backend system and the API implementation are deployed to several non-production environments in addition to production.
Rate limiting of the backend system applies to all non-production environments. The production environment, however, does NOT have any rate limiting.
What is the most effective approach to conduct performance tests of the API implementation in a staging (non-production) environment?
One of the backend systems invoked by an API implementation enforces rate limits on the number of requests a particular client can make. Both the backend system and the API implementation are deployed to several non-production environments in addition to production.
Rate limiting of the backend system applies to all non-production environments. The production environment, however, does NOT have any rate limiting.
What is the most effective approach to conduct performance tests of the API implementation in a staging (non-production) environment?
MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I Exam Question 102
What metrics about API invocations are available for visualization in custom charts using Anypoint Analytics?
MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I Exam Question 103
An organization plans to extend its Mule APIs to the EU (Frankfurt) region.
Currently, all Mule applications are deployed to CloudHub 1.0 in the default North American region, from the North America control plane, following this naming convention: {API-name}-{environment} (for example, Orderssapi-dev, Orders-sapi--qa, Orders-sapi--prod, etc.).
There is no network restriction to block communications between APIs.
What strategy should be implemented in order to deploy the same Mule APIs to the CloudHub 1.0 EU region from the North America control plane, as well as to minimize latency between APIs and target users and systems in Europe?
Currently, all Mule applications are deployed to CloudHub 1.0 in the default North American region, from the North America control plane, following this naming convention: {API-name}-{environment} (for example, Orderssapi-dev, Orders-sapi--qa, Orders-sapi--prod, etc.).
There is no network restriction to block communications between APIs.
What strategy should be implemented in order to deploy the same Mule APIs to the CloudHub 1.0 EU region from the North America control plane, as well as to minimize latency between APIs and target users and systems in Europe?
MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I Exam Question 104
In a Mule Application, a flow contains two (2) JMS consume operations that are used to connect to a JMS broker and consume messages from two(2) JMS destination. The Mule application then joins the two JMS messages together.
The JMS broker does not implement high availability (HA) and periodically experiences scheduled outages of upto 10 mins for routine maintenance.
What is the most idiomatic (used for its intented purpose) way to build the mule flow so it can best recover from the expected outages?
The JMS broker does not implement high availability (HA) and periodically experiences scheduled outages of upto 10 mins for routine maintenance.
What is the most idiomatic (used for its intented purpose) way to build the mule flow so it can best recover from the expected outages?
MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I Exam Question 105
A project uses Jenkins to implement CI/CD process. It was observed that each Mule package contains some of the Jenkins files and folders for configurations of CI/CD jobs.
As these files and folders are not part of the actual package, expectation is that these should not be part of deployed archive.
Which file can be used to exclude these files and folders from the deployed archive?
As these files and folders are not part of the actual package, expectation is that these should not be part of deployed archive.
Which file can be used to exclude these files and folders from the deployed archive?