Reciprocity is one of the high-level principles that govern the relationship between the FATF and the FSRBs.
It means that both the FATF and the FSRBs should respect and acknowledge each other's work, such as standard setting, mutual evaluations, and follow-up processes. Reciprocity also implies that the FATF and the FSRBs should have similar mechanisms or practices for ensuring effective participation of their members in their activities.: = The main reference for this question is the document titled "High-Level Principles and Objectives for FATF and FATF-style regional bodies" published by the FATF in February 2019. You can access it by clicking here. You can also find more information about the FSRBs and their roles on the FATF website and the Sygna blog.
Reference:https://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/High-Level%20Principles%20and%20Objectives%
20for%20FATF%20and%20FSRBs.pdf (4)

When implementing a risk-based approach related to casinos, the risks related to the customer as an individual are mainly based on the customer's profile, behaviour, source of funds, and geographic location. Among the options given, B and D are the most relevant factors that could indicate a higher risk of money laundering or terrorist financing.
Casual customers are those who do not have a regular or established relationship with the casino, and who may visit the casino only once or occasionally. They may not provide sufficient or reliable identification information, or may use false or stolen identities. They may also engage in suspicious transactions, such as large cash purchases of chips, minimal or no gaming activity, or frequent transfers of chips between customers. Casual customers pose a higher risk of money laundering or terrorist financing because they are harder to verify, monitor, and trace by the casino operators.
Customer from a high-risk country is a customer who resides in, or has links to, a country that is subject to sanctions, embargoes, or similar measures, or that is identified by credible sources as having significant levels of corruption, or as being a source, transit, or destination of illicit funds. Such customers pose a higher risk of money laundering or terrorist financing because they may be involved in, or connected to, criminal or terrorist activities, or may be using funds that are derived from or intended for such activities.: = The main reference for this question is the document titled "FATF Guidance on the Risk-Based Approach for Casinos" published by the FATF in October 2008. You can access it by clicking here. You can also find more information about the risk-based approach and the customer risks for casinos on the Gambling Commission website and the Exam Answer website.

In the context ofgambling and gaming sectors, a well-known money laundering typology is the use of platforms tointroduce illicit funds and withdraw them as "winnings". When a customerdeposits large cash amounts and quickly withdraws themwithout engaging in actual gambling, it indicates"placement and layering"techniques.
This behavior is indicative of attempts todisguise the origin of illicit funds, converting them into legitimate- looking financial flows. It is considered a classic red flag in AML programs related to casinos and online gaming.
Reference: ACAMS CAMS Study Guide - 6th Edition, Chapter:Industry-Specific Risks- Section:
Gambling and Gaming Sector Red Flags

According to the third European Directive on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing1, Member States may allow the identity verification of the beneficiary under the policy to be carried out at or before the time of payout or before the beneficiary intends to exercise rights vested under the policy, provided that the following conditions are met:
* the beneficiary is identified as a natural or legal person or a legal arrangement, and the verification of the identity is not possible earlier, due to the nature of the product or the transaction;
* there is a low risk of money laundering or terrorist financing, taking into account the type of policy, the product features, the premium amount, and the distribution channel;
* the Member States adopt appropriate risk-sensitive measures to prevent the misuse of the policy during the life of the relationship.
This provision is intended to accommodate the specificities of the life insurance sector, where the beneficiary may not be known at the time of the conclusion of the contract, or may change during the life of the policy.
However, the Directive also requires that the identity verification of the beneficiary is carried out as soon as possible after the establishment of the business relationship, and that the insurance undertaking applies enhanced customer due diligence measures when the beneficiary is a politically exposed person.
:
1: Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing (OJ L 309,
25.11.2005, p. 15) 2

A: Geographic risks should be used to identify the priority of the Fl in this scenario. According to the CAMS Manual (6th Edition), "Geographic risk refers to the possibility that the location of a customer, transaction, or product may increase the likelihood of money laundering or terrorist financing because of weak or nonexistent AML/CFT controls" (p. 59). In this scenario, the expansion to an area of the world with weak AML laws would increase the Fl's geographic risk.
Reference: Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialist (the 6th edition), Section 3.2.3 Geographic Risks, p.
59.