Online Access Free CFE-Law Exam Questions
| Exam Code: | CFE-Law |
| Exam Name: | Certified Fraud Examiner |
| Certification Provider: | ACFE |
| Free Question Number: | 220 |
| Posted: | Oct 11, 2026 |
Lorna is an employee at Victorian Inc., a private company in a jurisdiction in which the public has the legal right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure by government authorities. Management suspects that Lorna is misappropriating funds from the company, so it instructs Charlie, an investigator employed by Victorian, to search Lorna's company-issued laptop. Charlie finds incriminating evidence on Lorna's laptop and gives it to law enforcement. However, by failing to obtain a search warrant before conducting his search, Charlie violated Lorna's rights.
Luisa is charged with violating a criminal law that prohibits making false statements to government agencies.
Which of the following is NOT one of the elements the government must prove?
XYZ Company sued Faith to recover damages based on a claim of misappropriation of funds. In the same civil proceeding, Faith sued XYZ for false imprisonment that allegedly occurred during an interview. In this situation, the claim by Faith against XYZ Company can BEST be described as a:
Evidence that tends to make some fact that is in dispute more or less likely than it would be without the evidence is called:
Samson Inc. operates in a jurisdiction that prohibits unreasonable workplace searches and surveillance in areas or items where employees have a reasonable expectation of privacy. In which of the following areas or items can an employee at Samson Inc. most likely have a reasonable expectation of privacy during a workplace search?