The selected resolution is Configure peer-gateway under the VPC domain on both peers because the failure is in the Fibre Channel/FCoE control path around vPC, VXLAN. Cisco MDS and Nexus platforms separate configuration from operational state: a VSAN, zone, vFC binding, device alias, or port-security entry can exist in configuration but still fail if it is not active, correctly merged, or allowed on the link. The correct option addresses the fabric condition that prevents communication. The incorrect options are technically adjacent but would not repair the specific dependency; for example, changing unrelated databases or resetting ports without correcting policy leaves the same failure to recur. Cisco SAN troubleshooting therefore starts with port role and VSAN checks, then confirms fabric services such as fcdomain, FSPF, zoning, fabric binding, and name-server information. The expected validation is that the port becomes operational, the initiator and target appear in the appropriate databases, and permitted zone members can communicate.

The answer is speed auto because Cisco Nexus and ACI forwarding depends on exact agreement between the devices participating in the feature. The scenario references vPC, LACP, Cisco Nexus, Nexus 9000, Cisco Nexus 9000; those technologies fail in predictable ways when required parameters do not match or when the required control-plane advertisement is absent. In DCIT troubleshooting, the engineer should identify the failed dependency, correct that dependency, and then verify the operational table that proves the fix. For example, vPC and EVPN checks focus on consistency, VNI/VRF bindings, peer-gateway behavior, and host- route advertisement; routing checks focus on neighbor state, MTU, timers, authentication, next-hop, and route preference. The selected answer addresses the dependency that blocks forwarding. The distractors are plausible because they touch related features, but they do not resolve the specific failure condition. Post- change validation should include protocol state, learned endpoint or route entries, and a traffic test across the affected path.

The correct remediation is Set the IP prefix route to represent [5]:[0] :[0]:[32] :[10.10.10.10]/224 in the routing table. In Cisco data center troubleshooting, the first priority is to isolate whether the failure is caused by the underlay, overlay control plane, first-hop gateway behavior, or a consistency parameter. This item is centered on VXLAN, EVPN, BGP, so the selected action targets the condition that prevents normal forwarding rather than masking the symptom. Cisco Nexus and ACI guidance treats vPC, VXLAN EVPN, OTV, OSPF, BGP, HSRP, and LACP issues as state-dependent technologies: a neighbor, peer, VLAN, VNI, multicast group, timer, MTU, or policy mismatch can leave the protocol partially operational while traffic is still dropped. The rejected alternatives either change unrelated attributes, introduce a new inconsistency, or affect only a secondary behavior. The operational check after applying the fix should be to confirm adjacency or peer state, validate the relevant route/MAC/endpoint table, and test traffic in the affected VLAN or VRF.
This aligns with Cisco DCIT network troubleshooting methodology for isolating control-plane state before changing data-plane policy.

Assign an MP-BGP AS number to the fabric; Specify the spine nodes as route reflectors is the valid corrective action because the failure described is a protocol or fabric state problem, not a generic connectivity issue. For BGP, ACI, Cisco troubleshooting expects the engineer to compare both endpoints of the relationship: vPC peers must agree on consistency parameters, HSRP peers must exchange hellos in the same VLAN and version context, OSPF/BGP peers must match the attributes required for stable adjacency, and VXLAN EVPN must advertise the correct host or prefix information. The selected option restores that required state.
The other options either operate on the wrong layer, change a value that is not used to form the relationship, or would make the peer relationship less deterministic. A clean validation is to inspect the control-plane table first, then verify the forwarding table, and finally test end-to-end traffic. This is the Cisco-preferred approach because it avoids random changes and confirms that the fabric is forwarding based on correct protocol state.

The correct answer is Update the CNA firmware and driver versions. Cisco MDS and Nexus SAN troubleshooting is driven by fabric state: the host and target must be in the correct VSAN, must complete FLOGI/PLOGI where applicable, and must be permitted by active zoning, fcdomain, FSPF, NPV/NPIV, or port-security policy. This question focuses on firmware, Cisco Nexus, so the selected action fixes the dependency that prevents the initiator, target, or inter-switch link from becoming usable. Cisco documentation emphasizes checking VSAN membership, active zonesets, correct port mode, fabric binding, device-alias consistency, and the relevant FC databases before changing unrelated server settings. The distractors either target a different database, use the wrong port role, or would not cause the observed Fibre Channel state to change. After the fix, the engineer should confirm the interface state, FLOGI database, name-server entries, zoneset activation, and successful initiator-to-target reachability with tools such as fcping or fabric show commands.