Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation:
The CQAP's primary role in Phase 1 is to ensure Pre-Assessment Form accuracy before eMASS upload (Option A). Options B, C, and D are not CQAP duties.
Extract from Official Document (CAP v1.0):
* Section 1.6 - Prepare for Assessment (pg. 18):"The CQAP verifies the accuracy andcompleteness of the Pre-Assessment Form data before uploading to CMMC eMASS." References:
CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v1.0, Section 1.6.

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation:
The CAP requires noting deficiencies like an outdated signature as an evidence gap while assessing all evidence, including interviews (Option B). Option A ignores the gap, Option C is premature, and Option D involves consulting, which is not allowed.
Extract from Official Document (CAP v1.0):
* Section 2.2 - Conduct Assessment (pg. 25):"Document deficiencies such as outdated signatures as evidence gaps and assess based on implementation evidence." References:
CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v1.0, Section 2.2.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:
The VNA, used to measure coating properties, is a Specialized Asset per the CMMC Assessment Scope - Level 2, as it is test equipment tied to contract performance. Specialized Assets are in scope but not assessed against the full 110 CMMC practices unless they process, store, or transmit CUI (not indicated here). Instead, they must be documented and reviewed in the SSP per practice CA.L2-3.12.4 to ensure risk-based management. Option A is incorrect as it's in scope. Option C overextends the assessment requirement. Option D is vague but aligns partially with B, which is more precise.
Reference:
CMMC Assessment Scope - Level 2, Section 2.3.4 (Specialized Assets), p. 6: "Specialized Assets are reviewed in the SSP per CA.L2-3.12.4."

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
PE.L2-3.10.6 requires "safeguarding CUI at alternate work sites." Effective methods focus on technical controls like encryption (A), patch management (C), and secure VPNs (D), which directly protect CUI data and systems. Employing guards (B) is a physical security measure suited for controlled facilities, not distributed alternate sites like homes, making it least effective for gathering information on CUI protection in this context. The CMMC guide emphasizes technical safeguards over physical presence at remote locations.
Extract from Official CMMC Documentation:
* CMMC Assessment Guide Level 2 (v2.0), PE.L2-3.10.6: "Implement technical safeguards (e.g., encryption, VPN) for CUI at alternate work sites."
* NIST SP 800-171A, 3.10.6: "Examine technical controls, not physical guarding, for remote site compliance." Resources:
* https://dodcio.defense.gov/Portals/0/Documents/CMMC/AG_Level2_MasterV2.
0_FINAL_202112016_508.pdf

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation:
The CAP requires the Lead Assessor to ensure evidence fully demonstrates compliance with CMMC practices. The SSP's omission of privileged account management procedures indicates an evidence gap for practices like AC.L2-3.1.3 (Control Access). Option A (accepting) ignores this gap, risking an inaccurate assessment. Option B (explaining but accepting) is not actionable per CAP, as assessors cannot coach. Option C (marking "Not Met") is premature without seeking additional evidence. Option D aligns with CAP's guidance to request further evidence to address deficiencies.
Extract from Official Document (CAP v1.0):
* Section 2.2 - Conduct Assessment (pg. 25):"If evidence does not fully demonstrate compliance with a practice, the Lead Assessor shall request additional evidence from the OSC to address the gap." References:
CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v1.0, Section 2.2.