The best way to ensure that security risk is properly addressed when implementing an information security policy exception process is to confirm process owners' acceptance of residual risk. Residual risk is the risk that remains after applying controls or mitigating measures to reduce the original risk1. Process owners are the individuals or groups that are responsible for the design, execution, and performance of a business process2. By confirming process owners' acceptance of residual risk, the enterprise can ensure that the security risk associated with the policy exception is understood, acknowledged, and agreed upon by the relevant stakeholders. This can also help to assign accountability and liability for the potential consequences of the policy exception, as well as to monitor and review the risk level and the effectiveness of the controls or mitigating measures. The other options are not as effective as confirming process owners' acceptance of residual risk for ensuring that security risk is properly addressed when implementing an information security policy exception process. Performing an internal and external network penetration test is a useful technique for identifying and exploiting vulnerabilities in the network infrastructure, but it does not address the specific security risk related to the policy exception. Obtaining IT security approval on security policy exceptions is a necessary step for validating and authorizing the policy exception, but it does not ensure that the process owners are aware of and accept the residual risk. Benchmarking policy against industry best practice is a good practice for comparing and improving the policy quality and performance, but it does not address the security risk associated with the policy exception.

Aligning EA and procurement strategies is the best way to ensure the success of the supplier policy that requires multiple technology suppliers. EA provides a holistic view of the current and future state of the enterprise's IT architecture, including its business processes, applications, data, infrastructure, and security.
Procurement strategies define how the enterprise will acquire the necessary IT resources, services, and solutions from external suppliers. By aligning EA and procurement strategies, the enterprise can ensure that the supplier selection and management are consistent with the enterprise's vision, goals, and requirements, and that the suppliers can deliver value, quality, and innovation to the enterprise. References: CGEIT Domain
2: IT Resources

The primary consideration for an enterprise when deciding whether to adopt a qualitative risk assessment method is:
The level of detail and accuracy required for the risk assessment. Qualitative risk assessment is a method that uses scenarios, subjectivity, and knowledge to evaluate risks. It does not provide specific objective measurements of exposure, but rather a relative ranking or rating of risks based on their likelihood and impact1. Qualitative risk assessment is suitable for situations where the data is scarce, uncertain, or incomplete, or where the risk assessment needs to be done quickly and easily1. However, qualitative risk assessment may also be biased, inconsistent, or inaccurate, as it depends on the judgment and experience of the risk assessors1. Therefore, an enterprise should consider the level of detail and accuracy required for the risk assessment before choosing a qualitative method. If the enterprise needs more precise and reliable estimates of risk exposure, it may opt for a quantitative method instead1.
The other options are not the primary consideration for an enterprise when deciding whether to adopt a qualitative risk assessment method. The method identifies areas to immediately address vulnerabilities, enables an analysis of recommended controls, and provides a platform for all departments to contribute to the risk assessment are all possible benefits or outcomes of using a qualitative risk assessment method, but they are not the main factor that influences the decision to use it. They may also apply to other methods of risk assessment, such as quantitative or hybrid methods2.

The business strategy requiring significant IT resource scalability over the next five years is the best justification for the decision to outsource portions of IT operations, as it implies that the manufacturing company needs to adapt to changing market demands, customer expectations, and business opportunities. Outsourcing IT operations can provide the company with access to external IT resources, such as infrastructure, software, and services, that can be scaled up or down according to the business needs and goals12. Outsourcing IT operations can also help the company to reduce costs, improve efficiency, and focus on its core competencies

When preparing a new IT strategic plan for board approval, the MOST important consideration is to ensure the plan identifies roles and responsibilities that link to IT objectives. A well-defined IT strategic plan should clearly articulate the vision, mission, goals, and objectives of the IT function, as well as the strategies and actions to achieve them1. However, without assigning roles and responsibilities to the relevant stakeholders, the plan may lack accountability, ownership, and alignment2. Therefore, it is crucial to identify who is responsible for what, how they will collaborate and communicate, and how they will be measured and rewarded3. This can help to ensure the successful execution and monitoring of the IT strategic plan, as well as the alignment with the business strategy and expectations4.
The other options are not as important as option A. While it is useful to have specific resourcing requirements, frameworks, and implications of the strategy on the procurement process, these are more operational and tactical aspects that can be determined later in the implementation phase. They are not essential for the board approval of the IT strategic plan, which should focus more on the strategic direction and value proposition of the IT function. References := How to Write an Information Technology (IT) Business Proposal | Examples1 The Role of Board Approval in the Strategic Planning Process - Veralon2 How To Get The Board To Say Yes - Gartner3 The Board's Role in Strategy | WATSON4 Overseeing strategy: A framework for boards of directors - CPA Canada