An email digital signature will verify to recipient the integrity of an email message because it ensures that the message has not been altered or tampered with during transit, and confirms that the message originated from the sender and not an imposter. An email digital signature will not protect the confidentiality of an email message because it does not encrypt or hide the message content from unauthorized parties. An email digital signature will not automatically correct unauthorized modification of an email message because it does not change or restore the message content if it has been altered or tampered with. An email digital signature will not prevent unauthorized modification of an email message because it does not block or stop any attempts to alter or tamper with the message content. Reference: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/secure-messages-by-using-a-digital-signature-549ca2f1-a68f-4366-85fa-b3f4b5856fc6 https://www.techtarget.com/searchsecurity/definition/digital-signature

The best security control for an organization that permits the storage and use of its critical and sensitive information on employee-owned smartphones is establishing the authority to remote wipe. Remote wipe is a feature that allows an authorized administrator or user to remotely erase the data on a device in case of loss, theft, or compromise1. Remote wipe can help prevent unauthorized access or disclosure of the organization's information on employee-owned smartphones, as well as protect the privacy of the employee's personal dat a. Remote wipe can be implemented through various methods, such as mobile device management (MDM) software, native device features, or third-party applications2. However, remote wipe requires the consent and cooperation of the employee, as well as a clear policy that defines the conditions and procedures for its use. The other options are not the best security controls for an organization that permits the storage and use of its critical and sensitive information on employee-owned smartphones. Developing security awareness training is an important measure to educate employees about the security risks and responsibilities associated with using their own smartphones for work purposes, but it does not provide a technical or physical protection for the data on the devices3. Requiring the backup of the organization's data by the user is a good practice to ensure data availability and recovery in case of device failure or loss, but it does not prevent unauthorized access or disclosure of the data on the devices4. Monitoring how often the smartphone is used is a possible way to detect abnormal or suspicious activities on the devices, but it does not prevent or mitigate the impact of a data breach on the devices. Reference: 4: Mobile Device Backup - NIST 3: Security Awareness Training - NIST 1: Remote Wipe - Lifewire 2: How Businesses with a BYOD Policy Can Secure Employee Devices - IBM : Mobile Device Security Policy - SANS

Decreasing false positives is the best indicator that the information security manager has tuned the system to address senior management's concern that the organization's intrusion prevention system (IPS) may repeatedly disrupt business operations. False positives are alerts generated by the IPS when it mistakenly blocks legitimate traffic or activity, causing disruption or downtime. Decreasing false positives means that the IPS has been configured to reduce such errors and minimize unnecessary interruptions. Increasing false negatives is not a good indicator because it means that the IPS has failed to detect or block malicious traffic or activity, increasing the risk of compromise or damage. Decreasing false negatives is not a good indicator because it does not affect business operations, but rather improves security detection or prevention. Increasing false positives is not a good indicator because it means that the IPS has increased its errors and interruptions, worsening senior management's concern. Reference: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-6/the-value-of-penetration-testing https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2016/volume-5/security-scanning-versus-penetration-testing