CRISC Exam Question 616
Who should be accountable for ensuring effective cybersecurity controls are established?
Correct Answer: B
According to the CRISC Review Manual (Digital Version), the security management function is responsible for ensuring that effective cybersecurity controls are established and maintained. The security management function should:
Define the cybersecurity strategy and objectives aligned with the enterprise's risk appetite and business goals Establish and maintain the cybersecurity policies, standards, procedures and guidelines Implement and monitor the cybersecurity controls and processes Coordinate and communicate with other stakeholders, such as risk owners, IT management, enterprise risk function, internal and external auditors, regulators and third parties Report on the cybersecurity performance and risk posture to senior management and the board Continuously improve the cybersecurity capabilities and maturity References = CRISC Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 1: IT Risk Identification, Section 1.4: IT Risk Management Roles and Responsibilities, pp. 29-301
Define the cybersecurity strategy and objectives aligned with the enterprise's risk appetite and business goals Establish and maintain the cybersecurity policies, standards, procedures and guidelines Implement and monitor the cybersecurity controls and processes Coordinate and communicate with other stakeholders, such as risk owners, IT management, enterprise risk function, internal and external auditors, regulators and third parties Report on the cybersecurity performance and risk posture to senior management and the board Continuously improve the cybersecurity capabilities and maturity References = CRISC Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 1: IT Risk Identification, Section 1.4: IT Risk Management Roles and Responsibilities, pp. 29-301
CRISC Exam Question 617
Which of the following is the MAIN benefit of involving stakeholders in the selection of key risk indicators (KRIs)?
Correct Answer: A
The main benefit of involving stakeholders in the selection of key risk indicators (KRIs) is improving risk awareness, as it helps to communicate the risk exposure, appetite, and tolerance of the organization to the relevant parties. KRIs are metrics that provide information on the level of exposure to a given operational risk1. By involving stakeholders in the selection of KRIs, the risk practitioner can ensure that the KRIs are aligned with the stakeholder expectations, needs, and objectives, and that they reflect the most significant risks that affect the organization. This also helps to foster a risk culture and a shared understanding of risk among the stakeholders, which can enhance the risk management process and performance. The other options are not the main benefit of involving stakeholders in the selection of KRIs, although they may be some of the outcomes or advantages of doing so. Obtaining buy-in from risk owners, leveraging existing metrics, and optimizing risk treatment decisions are all important aspects of risk management, but they are not the primary reason for involving stakeholders in the selection of KRIs. References = Key Risk Indicators; Key Risk Indicators: A Practical Guide; The 10 Types of Stakeholders That You Meet in Business; What are Stakeholders? Stakeholder Definition | ASQ
CRISC Exam Question 618
Which of the following would be of GREATEST assistance when justifying investment in risk response strategies?
Correct Answer: C
A cost-benefit analysis is a technique that compares the costs and benefits of different risk response strategies, such as mitigating, transferring, avoiding, or accepting risks. A cost-benefit analysis can help justify investment in risk response strategies by showing the expected return on investment, the net present value, the break-even point, and the cost-effectiveness of each option. A cost-benefit analysis can also help prioritize the most optimal risk response strategies based on the available resources, the risk appetite, and the stakeholder expectations. References = Risk and Information Systems Control Study Manual, Chapter 3: Risk Response and Mitigation, Section 3.4: Risk Response Selection, p. 156-157.
CRISC Exam Question 619
Which of the following techniques would be used during a risk assessment to demonstrate to stakeholders that all known alternatives were evaluated?
Correct Answer: D
A decision tree is a technique that can be used during a risk assessment to demonstrate to stakeholders that all known alternatives were evaluated. A decision tree is a graphical tool that shows the possible outcomes and consequences of different choices or actions in a sequential and hierarchical manner. A decision tree can help to compare and contrast the alternatives based on their expected values, costs, benefits, and risks, as well as to identify the optimal or preferred alternative that maximizes the value or minimizes the risk. A decision tree can also help to communicate and explain the rationale and assumptions behind the decision-making process to the stakeholders. The other options are not the best techniques to demonstrate to stakeholders that all known alternatives were evaluated, although they may be useful and complementary. A control chart is a technique that monitors the performance and quality of a process or activity over time by plotting the data points and the control limits. A control chart can help to detect and analyze the variations or deviations from the expected or desired results, as well as to identify and correct the causes or sources of the variations. A sensitivity analysis is a technique that measures the impact of changes in one or more variables or parameters on the outcome or result of a model or a system. A sensitivity analysis can help to assess the uncertainty or variability of the outcome or result, as well as to determine the most influential or critical variables or parameters that affect the outcome or result. A trend analysis is a technique that examines the patterns or movements of data or information over time by using statistical or graphical methods. A trend analysis can help to forecast or predict the future behavior or direction of the data or information, as well as to identify and explain the factors or drivers that influence the data or information. References = CRISC Review Manual, pages 38-391; CRISC Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, page 922; Risk Assessment and Analysis Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative - ISACA3; Risk Assessment: Process, Examples, & Tools | SafetyCulture4
CRISC Exam Question 620
Which of the following would be MOST useful when measuring the progress of a risk response action plan?
Correct Answer: D
A risk response action plan is a document that outlines the specific tasks, resources, timelines, and deliverables for the risk responses, which are the actions or strategies that are taken to address the risks that may affect the organization's objectives, performance, or value creation12.
The most useful tool when measuring the progress of a risk response action plan is an up-to-date risk register, which is a document that records and tracks the significant risks that the organization faces, and the responses and actions that are taken to address them34.
An up-to-date risk register is the most useful tool because it provides a comprehensive and consistent view of the risk landscape, and the status and performance of the risk responses and actions34.
An up-to-date risk register is also the most useful tool because it enables the monitoring and evaluation of the risk response action plan, and the identification and communication of any issues or gaps that need to be resolved or improved34.
The other options are not the most useful tools, but rather possible metrics or indicators that may be used to measure the progress of a risk response action plan. For example:
Percentage of mitigated risk scenarios is a metric that measures the proportion of risk scenarios that have been reduced or eliminated by the risk responses and actions56. However, this metric is not the most useful tool because it does not provide a comprehensive and consistent view of the risk landscape, and it may not capture the residual or emerging risks that may arise after the risk responses and actions56.
Annual loss expectancy (ALE) changes is a metric that measures the difference between the expected annual losses before and after the risk responses and actions78. However, this metric is not the most useful tool because it does not provide a comprehensive and consistent view of the risk landscape, and it may not reflect the qualitative or intangible impacts of the risks or the risk responses and actions78.
Resource expenditure against budget is a metric that measures the amount of resources and funds that have been spent or allocated for the risk responses and actions, compared to the planned or estimated budget .
However, this metric is not the most useful tool because it does not provide acomprehensive and consistent view of the risk landscape, and it may not indicate the effectiveness or efficiency of the risk responses and actions . References =
1: Risk Response Plan in Project Management: Key Strategies & Tips1
2: How to Create the Ultimate Risk Response Plan | Wrike2
3: Risk Register Template and Examples | Prioritize and Manage Risk3
4: Risk Register Examples for Cybersecurity Leaders4
5: Risk Scenarios Toolkit, ISACA, 2019
6: Risk Scenarios Starter Pack, ISACA, 2019
7: Annualized Loss Expectancy (ALE) - Definition and Examples5
8: Annualized Loss Expectancy (ALE) Calculator6
Project Budgeting: How to Estimate Costs and Manage Budgets7
Project Budget Template - Download Free Excel Template8
The most useful tool when measuring the progress of a risk response action plan is an up-to-date risk register, which is a document that records and tracks the significant risks that the organization faces, and the responses and actions that are taken to address them34.
An up-to-date risk register is the most useful tool because it provides a comprehensive and consistent view of the risk landscape, and the status and performance of the risk responses and actions34.
An up-to-date risk register is also the most useful tool because it enables the monitoring and evaluation of the risk response action plan, and the identification and communication of any issues or gaps that need to be resolved or improved34.
The other options are not the most useful tools, but rather possible metrics or indicators that may be used to measure the progress of a risk response action plan. For example:
Percentage of mitigated risk scenarios is a metric that measures the proportion of risk scenarios that have been reduced or eliminated by the risk responses and actions56. However, this metric is not the most useful tool because it does not provide a comprehensive and consistent view of the risk landscape, and it may not capture the residual or emerging risks that may arise after the risk responses and actions56.
Annual loss expectancy (ALE) changes is a metric that measures the difference between the expected annual losses before and after the risk responses and actions78. However, this metric is not the most useful tool because it does not provide a comprehensive and consistent view of the risk landscape, and it may not reflect the qualitative or intangible impacts of the risks or the risk responses and actions78.
Resource expenditure against budget is a metric that measures the amount of resources and funds that have been spent or allocated for the risk responses and actions, compared to the planned or estimated budget .
However, this metric is not the most useful tool because it does not provide acomprehensive and consistent view of the risk landscape, and it may not indicate the effectiveness or efficiency of the risk responses and actions . References =
1: Risk Response Plan in Project Management: Key Strategies & Tips1
2: How to Create the Ultimate Risk Response Plan | Wrike2
3: Risk Register Template and Examples | Prioritize and Manage Risk3
4: Risk Register Examples for Cybersecurity Leaders4
5: Risk Scenarios Toolkit, ISACA, 2019
6: Risk Scenarios Starter Pack, ISACA, 2019
7: Annualized Loss Expectancy (ALE) - Definition and Examples5
8: Annualized Loss Expectancy (ALE) Calculator6
Project Budgeting: How to Estimate Costs and Manage Budgets7
Project Budget Template - Download Free Excel Template8
- Other Version
- 1817ISACA.CRISC.v2026-07-15.q907
- 2230ISACA.CRISC.v2026-03-31.q857
- 2588ISACA.CRISC.v2026-01-15.q649
- 4705ISACA.CRISC.v2025-08-27.q675
- 6753ISACA.CRISC.v2025-01-04.q999
- 3460ISACA.CRISC.v2024-06-13.q683
- 4721ISACA.CRISC.v2024-04-02.q999
- 4461ISACA.CRISC.v2023-07-10.q544
- 6979ISACA.CRISC.v2022-05-25.q338
- 76ISACA.Actual4dump.CRISC.v2022-04-12.by.newman.349q.pdf
- 6621ISACA.CRISC.v2022-02-22.q349
- 6831ISACA.CRISC.v2021-10-27.q295
- 42ISACA.Updatedumps.CRISC.v2021-09-05.by.bonnie.114q.pdf
- Latest Upload
- 184Microsoft.AI-300.v2026-08-08.q76
- 136Splunk.SPLK-1004.v2026-08-08.q55
- 121Oracle.1Z0-1075-26.v2026-08-08.q22
- 128VMware.3V0-21.25.v2026-08-08.q35
- 205APICS.CPIM-8.0.v2026-08-08.q264
- 189Cisco.300-720.v2026-08-08.q115
- 150Splunk.SPLK-1003.v2026-08-08.q94
- 144ISACA.AAIR.v2026-08-07.q41
- 133Microsoft.70-123.v2026-08-07.q37
- 149AMP.CRL.v2026-08-07.q61
[×]
Download PDF File
Enter your email address to download ISACA.CRISC.v2025-09-26.q726 Practice Test
