Section: Software Development Security

This is true, if we do not use parity in our RAID implementation, like RAID 1
(Mirroring) or RAID 0 (Stripping) we can improve performance because the CPU does not need waste cycles to make the parity calculations. For example this can be achieved in
Windows 2000 server through the use of RAID 0 (No fault tolerance, just stripping in 64kb chunks) or RAID 1 (Mirroring through a file system driver). This is not the case of RAID 5 that actually use parity to provide fault tolerance.

There are three types of alternate sites which disaster recovery planners consider:
Hot, warm and cold and they offer varying degrees of preparedness prior to their use.
Hot sites are the most ready and cold sites need the most support to bring them up to speed as a
site you can occupy after an emergency.
If your business earns millions a day in revenue then you would want a hot site ready to go if a
disaster occurs. The main goal is to resume business operations as soon as possible to return to full operating capacity.
The following answers are incorrect:
-Warm Site: Close answer but it is incorrect because it can take days to configure a warm site for use but it is less expensive to maintain than a hot site.
-Cold Site: Sorry, a cold site is most often an empty building with basic facilities like A/DC, power and takes days to configure for use. They're useful if you become aware of an impending need to move operations.
-Remote Site: This isn't a common term associated with alternate site planning.
The following reference(s) was used to create this question: 2013. Official Security+ Curriculum.