In a feasibility phase with high uncertainty and misaligned sponsor expectations, the best way to deliver business value is to reduce uncertainty quickly through incremental delivery and learning. An MVP approach decomposes the work into smaller, testable outcomes that can validate assumptions, confirm sponsor alignment, and surface constraints early. This supports benefits realization and value-based decision-making:
sponsors can see tangible results, refine targets, and redirect investment before large sunk costs accumulate.
While risk mitigation planning (B) is important, it is not sufficient when requirements and targets are unclear-risks will continue to change until value is validated. Recommending predictive management (C) is generally less effective under uncertainty because it presumes stable scope and clear requirements. Securing sponsor commitment through the end (D) ignores the feasibility purpose: to determine whether to proceed, pivot, or stop based on evidence. MVP-based subdivision provides the fastest feedback loop and improves alignment, feasibility confidence, and value delivery.

According to the PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 13.2.2.4, stakeholder engagement assessment matrix is a tool that can be used to identify the current and desired levels of engagement for each stakeholder or stakeholder group. The project manager should use this matrix to plan and implement appropriate strategies to increase the support and minimize the resistance of the stakeholders. One of the strategies is to meet with the stakeholder and discuss the impact of the project deliverable on their interests, needs, and expectations. The project manager should also explain the benefits of the deliverable for the organization and the stakeholder, and address any concerns or issues that the stakeholder may have. By doing so, the project manager can increase the stakeholder's awareness, understanding, and involvement in the project, and foster a positive relationship with them. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 13.2.2.4; PMI website

In the context of project management, particularly within agile environments, daily standup meetings are essential for maintaining alignment, providing immediate feedback, and building team dynamics. When team members regularly miss these meetings, it's crucial to address the issue promptly. Rescheduling the standups to a time that suits all team members can ensure that everyone can attend and contribute effectively. This aligns with the principles of effective project management and business analysis, which emphasize the importance of clear communication, stakeholder engagement, and adaptability to change.
: The information is consistent with the best practices for project management and business analysis, as discussed in resources like "Daily Standup Meetings in Project Management: An Essential Guide" and "How to Lead Effective Remote Meetings for Business Analysis" which highlight the importance of team alignment and the need to adapt meeting times to suit team availability12.

The project manager should first assess the current state process to understand the existing problems, needs, and opportunities for improvement. This will help to define the scope of the digitization project, which is the sum of the products, services, and results to be delivered by the project. Digitizing the current state process exactly as defined, redefining the current state process to scope the supporting software, or developing the software that will support the current state process are all actions that should be done after defining the project scope, not before. References: PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, page 71; Agile Practice Guide, page 37.