Online Access Free C-DBADM-2601 Exam Questions

A marine logistics company is planning a phased move from SAP HANA on-premises to SAP HANA Cloud. In the first rehearsal, the source export completes and the SAP HANA Cloud target is reachable. During post-transfer checks, the administrator notices that the validation workbook records transfer completion but has no evidence that monitoring and backup administration were reviewed for the cloud target after import. The project lead wants to approve the phase because the data movement finished.
The constraint is that the administrator must support incremental modernization while confirming that the target can be administered after migration. Approval must be based on transfer success plus operational readiness evidence.
What should the administrator recommend before approving the migration phase?

• A.Approve the phase because source export completion and target reachability prove the migration path works.
• B.Repeat only the source export so the data movement result is confirmed before the production window.
• C.Add target-side monitoring and backup administration validation to the rehearsal evidence, then approve only after those checks pass.
• D.Defer monitoring and backup administration review until after production cutover to keep the phased plan on schedule.

A regional vehicle leasing company is updating its SAP HANA administration evidence model for a mixed landscape. The on-premises database supports active reporting, while an SAP HANA Cloud environment is used for migration rehearsal. During review, the administrator finds that the same readiness label is applied to architecture notes, active workload checks, and cloud rehearsal evidence. SAP HANA cockpit confirms the on-premises database is available, and SAP HANA Cloud Central confirms the cloud environment is running.
The constraint is that the administrator must avoid using one readiness label for different architectural responsibilities. The handover must show which evidence belongs to active operation, which belongs to cloud readiness, and which belongs to migration preparation.
Which action best strengthens the administration evidence model?

• A.Use only the on-premises evidence because it supports the current active reporting workload.
• B.Approve cloud readiness based on SAP HANA Cloud Central availability and defer architectural evidence mapping.
• C.Keep one readiness label because both environments are part of the same SAP HANA administration scope.
• D.Separate evidence categories by active operation, cloud environment readiness, and migration preparation before approving handover.

A regional facilities management company runs SAP HANA for service request analytics. After a planned restart, SAP HANA cockpit shows the database as available, but a scheduled administrative validation script fails because it references a configuration profile that was renamed during the maintenance window. Manual checks from the cockpit succeed, so the service coordinator wants to close the restart activity.
The constraint is that the administrator must prove scheduled administration will execute correctly after the restart. The validation must address the renamed configuration reference rather than relying only on manual tool access.
What should the administrator do before closing the restart activity?

• A.Update and verify the scheduled validation reference to the renamed configuration profile, then rerun the administrative script.
• B.Replace the scheduled script with manual cockpit checks until the next maintenance window.
• C.Close the restart activity because manual SAP HANA cockpit checks show that the database is available.
• D.Reboot the database again so the scheduled script can rediscover the renamed configuration profile automatically.

CHALLENGE 4 - Receipt-to-Invoice Continuity During Transition Weekend
During overlap-period rehearsal, one plant shows clean invoice continuity for goods received near the transition weekend, while another plant shows less stable invoice results for comparable procurement cases. Reviewers find that the weaker cases were prepared under different upstream source, purchasing, and receipt assumptions. What is the best next action?

• A.Increase invoice-processing speed targets so both plants complete more transactions before comparison
• B.Move all overlap-period invoice handling to local finance teams so cases can be resolved faster
• C.Align upstream sequence assumptions and repeat receipt-to-invoice rehearsal for representative overlap-period cases
• D.Ignore plant differences and validate only the aggregate invoice completion count for the weekend

CHALLENGE 1 - Recovery Review Configuration Traceability
During recovery readiness review, scheduling test users can open appointment backlog reports from both SAP HANA systems. The newly installed validation database has its active configuration documented, but the upgraded reporting system has one post-upgrade value recorded only in a maintenance handover log. What should the administrator do before accepting the readiness comparison?

• A.Remove the documented value from the validation database record so both systems appear aligned.
• B.Reconcile the handover-log value into the upgraded system's current administration record.
• C.Accept the comparison because both systems return the required reports during review.
• D.Continue the review and check the handover log only if users report inconsistent results.