An analyst prepares an after action report following an incident in which multiple systems were compromised over several days. The analyst provides raw event logs from each compromised system in the report and determines that a patient-zero system cannot be found. Which of the following should the analyst do to determine the patient-zero system?
Correct Answer: A
The analyst must construct an accurate incident timeline . Patient zero is the earliest compromised system from which subsequent malicious activity originated or propagated. Determining it requires ordering events chronologically across all affected hosts and correlating authentication activity, process execution, network connections, malware creation times, lateral movement, and other evidence. Raw logs alone do not communicate this sequence effectively. Logs from different systems must first use reliable timestamps and then be normalized and correlated. Once events are ordered, the analyst can work backward from known compromises to determine which host displayed the earliest credible signs of intrusion and whether subsequent systems were reached from that host. Enabling additional monitoring helps detect future activity but does not reconstruct historical sequence by itself. Isolation is necessary during containment but does not establish which system was initially compromised. Shift-handoff improvements are useful organizationally but do not answer the forensic question. Malware composition analysis may identify relationships between samples, but it does not establish system-level chronology. NIST's incident-response guidance emphasizes analysis, documentation, root-cause understanding, and after- action reporting as inputs to continuous improvement. Study Guide Reference: Incident Response and Management # Timeline Analysis # Event Correlation # Patient Zero # Root Cause Analysis # After-Action Review.
