Explanation/Reference:
Explanation:
When investigating a security breach, it is important to preserve all traces of evidence left by the invader.
For this reason, it is imperative to preserve the memory' contents of the machine in order to analyze them later. The correct answer is choice C because a copy of the whole system's memory is obtained for future analysis by running the appropriate tools. This is also important from a legal perspective since an attorney may suggest that the system was changed during the conduct of the investigation. Running a computer forensics tool in the compromised machine will cause the creation of at least one process that may overwrite evidence. Rebooting the machine will delete the contents of the memory, erasing potential evidence. Collecting information about current connections and open Transmission Control Protocol/User Datagram Protocol (TCP/UDP) ports is correct, but doing so by using tools may also erase memory contents.

The first step in developing an information security strategy is to identify key stakeholders who can provide support, guidance and resources for information security initiatives. These stakeholders may include senior management, business unit leaders, legal counsel, audit and compliance officers and other relevant parties. By engaging these stakeholders early on, an information security manager can ensure that the strategy aligns with business objectives and expectations, as well as gain buy-in and commitment from them. Determining acceptable levels of risk, creating a roadmap and performing a gap analysis are all important steps in developing an information security strategy, but they should follow after identifying key stakeholders.

Explanation
The best way to obtain senior management support for an information security governance program is to demonstrate the program's value to the organization, such as how it can help achieve business objectives, reduce operational risks, enhance resilience, and comply with regulations. Demonstrating the value of information security governance can help senior management understand the benefits and costs of the program, and motivate them to participate in the decision-making process. The other options, such as discussing governance programs in similar organizations, providing external audit results, or providing examples of incidents, may not be sufficient or persuasive enough to obtain senior management support, as they may not reflect the specific needs and goals of the organization. References:
* https://www.isaca.org/resources/news-and-trends/isaca-now-blog/2020/how-to-involve-senior-managemen
* https://www.sans.org/white-papers/992/
* https://www.govtech.com/blogs/lohrmann-on-cybersecurity/how-to-get-management-support-for-your-sec