The correct answer is A. Carpet $120,000 . This question applies life-cycle cost comparison , which is commonly used in the Development Phase when VM alternatives are being analyzed for economic feasibility and owner value. The better value option is not determined by the lowest initial cost alone; it must include installed cost, maintenance cost, recurring service cost, and service life impacts.
For carpet:
Installed cost = 1,000 sq. m × $30 = $30,000 .
Vacuum maintenance = $500/month × 12 months × 10 years = $60,000 .
Annual shampoo = $3,000/year × 10 years = $30,000 .
Total carpet life-cycle cost = $30,000 + $60,000 + $30,000 = $120,000 .
For vinyl over a comparable 10-year ownership period:
Installed cost = 1,000 sq. m × $10 = $10,000 .
Vacuum maintenance = $400/month × 12 × 10 = $48,000 .
Strip and wax = $1,000/month × 12 × 10 = $120,000 .
Total vinyl cost = $178,000 .
Although vinyl has a lower initial cost, its recurring monthly strip-and-wax cost makes it more expensive.
Therefore, carpet provides the better value.
References/topics: Development Phase; Life-Cycle Costing; Economic Evaluation; Alternative Comparison; Owner Value.

The preferable qualities are expertise in their field and availability to attend . In the Preparation or Pre- Workshop stage, the Value Study must be properly planned, organized, staffed, and scheduled before the formal Job Plan begins. The SAVE Study Guide identifies Pre-Workshop activities such as identifying Value Team members , obtaining their commitment to project objectives, and determining study dates, times, location, and other logistical needs. ( ) Technical capability is essential because VM team members must gather and analyze information, identify functions, contribute ideas, evaluate ideas using their experience and expertise, develop alternatives, and present results. The guide specifically describes technical champions as team members selected because of their technical expertise. ( ) Availability is equally important because team members are expected to participate in all meetings, and timely attendance is listed as a responsibility. ( ) Option C is not preferred because VM requires collaborative idea generation, not personal advocacy or forcing individual solutions. Option D is directly contrary to VM team behavior, since the guide stresses open- mindedness and avoiding roadblocks.
References/topics: Preparation Phase; Pre-Workshop Activities; Value Team Member Selection; Team Member Responsibilities; VM Facilitation and Team Dynamics.

The correct answers are A and C . A well-managed Value Methodology program must have a structured process for deciding which subjects should receive VM studies and when VM should be applied . VM program management is not simply about conducting studies randomly; it requires screening potential projects, products, processes, or services to determine where VM effort can create meaningful value improvement. The VM Guide program-management section specifically includes "Selecting subjects for VM studies" and "Timing of VM studies" as key management areas. ( pdfcoffee.com ) Option A is correct because subject selection helps the organization focus limited VM resources on studies with suitable size, complexity, risk, cost, performance concern, or strategic importance. Option C is correct because timing matters. SAVE guidance notes that VM may be applied at different points in a subject's life cycle, and early application often improves direction before later implementation costs increase. ( ) Option B is incorrect because no VM program can guarantee return on investment from every individual study. Option D is incorrect because requiring a VM study on every subject would waste resources and ignore proper screening criteria.
References/topics: VM Programs; VM Program Management; Selecting VM Study Subjects; Timing of VM Studies; VM Application Criteria.

The correct answers are A and D . When decision-makers review VM study results but take no action, the facilitator is dealing with a change-response problem, not simply a technical presentation problem. In VM implementation guidance, this behavior aligns with the early "shock" response to change, where people may mentally shut down because the proposed change feels uncertain, risky, or disruptive. The recommended coping strategy is to create safety, structure, and visible support around the change.
Therefore, discussing allocation of time and resources is appropriate because implementation cannot move forward without clear commitment, staffing, schedule allowance, and management attention. The VM Guide identifies proper allocation of time and resources as a way to provide safety during change. It also states that shock and stress can be reduced by building a support network through a detailed implementation plan . ( pdfcoffee.com ) Option B is incorrect because the guidance emphasizes visible upper management support, not merely lower- level involvement. Option C is incorrect because limiting information increases uncertainty; the recommended approach is to provide broad, clear, and consistent information about the change.
References/topics: Implementation Phase; Change Management Strategies; Implementation Plan; Resource Allocation; Decision-Maker Engagement.

The correct answer is D. Customers . In Value Methodology, value is not judged mainly by the design team, facilitator, or internal decision makers. It is judged from the perspective of the party seeking or acquiring the needed function. The SAVE International Study Guide defines value as a relationship between function and resources , where the function is measured by the performance requirements of the customer , and the resources are the materials, labor, price, time, and other inputs required to accomplish that function. ( cdn..
com )
This means customers directly connect value with the functions they want to obtain. They are not buying materials, drawings, specifications, or technical complexity for their own sake; they are acquiring useful functions such as support load, move people, protect asset, reduce risk, or provide comfort. Users may experience the function, and decision makers may approve funding, but the customer is the party whose performance expectations define whether the function provides acceptable value.
Therefore, in CVS terms, customer requirements are central to value determination because function must satisfy customer expectations while resources are minimized or optimized.
References/topics: Function Analysis Phase; Value Definition; Customer Requirements; Function/Resources Relationship; VM Fundamentals.