The correct answers are A and C . In a VM Program, lessons learned should be captured, communicated, and converted into practical improvement for future value studies. Creating a summarized report and sharing it with the project team is appropriate because it records what worked, what did not work, what assumptions changed, what facilitation issues occurred, and what implementation barriers or success factors were observed.
Scheduling a team meeting is also appropriate because lessons learned are most useful when discussed, validated, and connected to future application. SAVE's VM Job Plan identifies Post-Study activity as completing changes, implementing changes, and monitoring status, with the objective of assuring implementation of approved recommendations. ( courses.washington.edu ) A lessons-learned review supports that same control mindset by improving future VM planning, team selection, facilitation, proposal development, and implementation follow-through.
Option B is weak because storing a report without distribution does not transfer knowledge. Option D is incorrect because successful projects still produce valuable positive lessons that should be repeated.
References/topics: VM Programs; Post-Study Activities; Lessons Learned; Knowledge Transfer; Continuous Improvement; VM Program Management.

The correct answer is D. demonstrate that the VM team understood objectives of the VM study . At an Implementation Meeting, the decision-makers are not primarily looking for a training session on Value Methodology or a review of the VM Job Plan. They need confidence that the VM study results are grounded in the actual project objectives, constraints, required functions, and success criteria.
A five-minute presentation must be concise and decision-focused. The facilitator should quickly show that the VM team understood the study scope, owner goals, performance needs, cost drivers, risks, and implementation expectations. This builds credibility before decision-makers review the disposition of VM proposals.
Option A is incorrect because the Job Plan explains the process, but implementation decision-makers need results and alignment, not a phase-by-phase lecture. Option B is also too broad for a five-minute implementation presentation. Option C is inappropriate because the meeting is not about individual team- member recognition. The strongest presentation is one that links the VM recommendations back to the study objectives and shows that the team's proposals support those objectives.
References/topics: Implementation Phase; Implementation Meeting; VM Proposal Disposition; Study Objectives; Decision-Maker Confidence.

The correct approaches are A, B, and D because the facilitator's role in the Evaluation Phase is to keep the team in a structured, objective decision process rather than prematurely discarding ideas or resetting the workshop. SAVE's Value Methodology Standard defines the Evaluation Phase as the point where the team uses a structured process to select ideas with value-improvement potential while considering project functions, performance requirements, and resource limits. ( ) When consensus is difficult, the facilitator should first clarify the idea. Modifying the idea title can remove ambiguity, improve shared understanding, and ensure the team is evaluating the same concept. Asking for more information is also appropriate because disagreement often reflects insufficient technical, cost, risk, or implementation detail.
The facilitator must also ensure that every team member has provided input, since VM relies on multidisciplinary team judgment and stakeholder expertise. The Standard identifies the team as a multidisciplinary group chosen for relevant expertise and experience, including different points of view. ( ) Removing the idea is premature unless it clearly fails criteria, and restarting the evaluation process is unnecessary unless the entire evaluation basis is invalid.
References/topics: Evaluation Phase; VM Facilitation; Team Consensus; Structured Evaluation; Idea Clarification.

The correct answer is A. Intuitive Creativity Method . In the CVS Value Methodology framework, the Creativity Phase is designed to generate a large quantity of ideas for performing the functions selected during Function Analysis. The SAVE VM Standard describes the Creative Phase as an effort to develop many ideas for "performing each function selected for study," with judgment suspended and free idea flow encouraged.
The intuitive creativity method is based on considering the overall problem and allowing ideas to emerge freely through association, imagination, and non-linear thinking. The VM Guide states that intuitive creativity methods are based on the "overall problem" and that brainstorming by function is a prime example. This matches the question exactly.
Option C, Discursive Creativity Method , is incorrect because it follows a deliberate, structured, step-by-step procedure by breaking the problem into sub-problems. Option D, Empirical Creativity Method , is more experimental or data-driven. Option B is not the standard classification used here.
References/topics: Creativity Phase; Creativity Techniques; Intuitive Creativity Methods; Brainstorming by Function; Creating by Function

The correct answers are B and C . A VM facilitator encourages innovation by moving the team beyond existing assumptions, current habits, and normal organizational boundaries. In the Creativity Phase, SAVE- oriented VM guidance emphasizes generating ideas for all possible ways to accomplish the required functions, rather than defending the existing solution. ( Value Engineering ) The facilitator therefore supports future-focused thinking, where the team imagines an ideal condition and considers long-term potential before judging feasibility. This is consistent with VM practice because creativity must be allowed to expand before evaluation, cost review, or technical screening begins.
Option C is also correct because innovation often comes from cross-disciplinary transfer. Borrowing ideas from other industries, technologies, processes, or disciplines helps the team discover alternative ways to perform the required function. The Creative Phase is specifically described as being unconstrained by habit, tradition, negative attitudes, assumed restrictions, and specific criteria. ( UW Courses ) Option A is incorrect because simply maintaining current systems preserves the baseline and limits breakthrough thinking. Option D is incorrect because avoiding combinations and testing prevents idea development and blocks innovation.
References/topics: VM Facilitation; Team Dynamics; Creativity Phase; Innovation; Divergent Thinking; Long-Term Value Potential.